President Obama urges G-20 nations to spend; they pledge to halve deficits

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/27/AR2010062701754.html

TORONTO – President Obama warned Sunday that the world economic recovery remains “fragile” and urged continued spending to support growth, an expansionist call at the end of a summit marked by an agreement among developed nations to halve their annual deficits within three years.

The president’s remarks tempered the Group of 20’s headline achievement at the summit, a deficit-reduction target that had been pushed by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the host of the meeting and a fiscal conservative. Although there is broad agreement that government debt in the developed world needs to be reduced, there is concern that cutting too fast and too deeply will slow growth and possibly spark a new recession.

In a news conference at the meeting’s conclusion, Obama said that the world’s largest economic powers had agreed on the need for “continued growth in the short term and fiscal sustainability in the medium term.”

“A number of our European partners are making difficult decisions,” Obama said. “But we must recognize that our fiscal health tomorrow will rest in no small measure on our ability to create jobs and growth today.”

The group’s closing statement included the specific deficit-reduction target, but it was couched in caveats – that deficit reduction needed to be “calibrated” to avoid harming growth, paced differently in each country and paired with other reforms to strengthen the economy.

Obama and European leaders, in particular, came to the meeting with sharply different views of the strength of the global economic recovery, with the U.S. president more pessimistic. The declaration, in the works for weeks, gave each side what it wanted, although the specific deadlines went further than the Obama administration had preferred before the meeting.

The administration accepted the deadlines in order to avoid standing against Harper and such important economic powers as Germany. In his closing remarks, Obama stressed that “every country will chart its own unique course, but make no mistake – we’re moving in the same direction.”

The International Monetary Fund’s managing director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, called the deficit target an “oversimplification” of the problem; he said it was more important for individual countries to craft the right economic policies to sustain growth, not blindly cut for the sake of meeting a goal.

ad_icon

Along with pledging to cut their annual budget deficits by 2013, the developed countries committed to stabilizing their overall debt by 2016. Obama recently set similar goals for the United States.

Despite the seeming division between the United States’ deficit-reduction target and the slower approach favored by Canada and Germany, Obama said there was “violent agreement” within the group about the need to find proper balance – with some highly indebted countries such as Greece needing to cut immediately and others supporting the recovery with higher spending.

Overall, the group’s final statement reflects its consensus theory for how the world economy needs to change, with the heavily indebted Western nations steadily taming government deficits, and surplus-rich nations “rebalancing” to boost local spending and demand.

Strong emerging markets such as China, the document said, need to guard against a slowdown by encouraging their governments and people to spend more, investing more on infrastructure, establishing better social safety nets to give families more income, and allowing exchange rates to fluctuate more freely – a quiet reference to China’s managed currency policies. China is a member of the G-20.

My award of this whole episode of mass stupidity goes to Obama himself for suggesting that cutting spending and slowing inflation is what brought Hitler to power in the 1920s. What an assnine thing to say. It was exactly the opposite behavior in the Weimar Republic that lead to the mass inflation that destroyed German society and facilitated the rise of Hitler and Fascism.

mccain said something like that but the matter was on foreign policy and he was debating Ron Paul over non interventionism

It’s rather obvious that the rest of the world has figured out that spending doesn’t lead to the economic recovery they thought it would. Gosh, who tried before and failed, also? Oh yeah, the worst president of the last 100 years (so far) - FDR. The only thing that brought the US out of the Great Depression was WWII and the build-up to it by our Allies. There are signs that the stock market is on the exact same path as it was during the Great Depression, which is signaling that we’re on the road to a double-dip recession.

Can you cite this? I couldn’t find anything.

WW2 did not bring the USA out of the depression. Use your head. How could sending millions of people to their deaths and destroying tons and tons of resources cause a recovery?

Look for a thread here about rationing during WW2, very enlightening.

What ended the depression was the end of the war, when govt cut back spending.

how could you say in the same post that spending was shown not to cause prosperity, and then say that WWII which is huge spending plus massive destruction of life and property, brought us out of the depression.

This actually confirmed my previous views. A certain feeling of unease is starting to set in among “world leaders” and nowhere was more apparent than at Toronto. Over the past three years they tried every trick in their book and every single trick has failed if not backfired. They now know they have to do something drastic about it. Do they know they have to slash spending, cut taxes and encourage saving to have a healthy host they can bleed for sustenance? Yes they do. Do they want to go down this way? Absolutely not.

Tocqueville elegantly remarked that democracy works until politicians discover they can bribe electors with their own money. That’s where the problem is. Western people have become so addicted to these bribes that they are already in a rage at the prospect of losing a single phony “service”. They won’t riot, but they will vote out of office anyone attempting to “destroy the welfare State”. The large, faceless bureaucracies running the scheme are only too happy to throw their weight on the scales. The G20 started out as an attempt to provide some muscle to selling cuts to the addicted electorate but failed in spectacular fashion. Nowhere this is more evident than in Europe, where the original cost-cutting plans are being slowly scaled down and fiscal pressure is slowly creeping up to make ends. Since tax increases will hit “the rich” (which more often than not equates to “wealth producing activities”) the drug addicts are rejoicing at the prospect of getting some more poison in their veins courtesy of somebody else.

I see the G20 as a perfect representation of the forces ripping our society. The voices of reason (which more often than not tend to be very weak and to give way too many concessions) are immediately drowned by the flamboyant, hypocritical types who will start to use the usual arguments (mostly centered around fear and guilt) to have their own way. And they will have it.

Stephen Harper is the same kind of fiscal conservative as George Bush.