Rothbards Critique of Hume: (Seek clarification)

[nirgrahamUK]

sigh

David Osterfeld on natural rights

in fact, he is not switchign from 1 to 2, but everywhere using 2. because argumentation is something different from two tape machines with different ‘arguments’(sic) loaded in set up to sound off with each other in a room. there are norms to argumentation. its called the apriori of argumentation Frank van Dun, The key to understanding the argument from argumentation is, first, that when they are told or asked (not) to believe, say, or do something people are likely and in fact entitled to qu…