In an ideal scenario, should economics be a science that aspires to rid itself of the biases exerted upon it by the passions and desires of multiple individuals and groups?
As far as I know economics is a value-free science.
There is no such thing as value free science. Where would science be without valuing truth, curiosity, or openness to criticism? Science is a human activity that answers to human needs.
Really now? To clarify, I’m talking about macroeconomics, mostly. But can you honestly say Ricardian economics is value-free? Is Keynesianism value-free? I have read so many Austrian criticisms about the collectivist philosophy of these schools. Many economic theories, Austrianism included, are seemingly based around a philosophical leaning, not just a theoretical/mathematical premise.
I can only hope economists share your same openness to embracing empiricism, objectivity and the actual truth.
I’m afraid you will just have to get rid of politics to do that.
Politics is economics, because everything politicians do; have an adverse effect on the economy.
Good day.