So wait...the Federal Reserve is NOT privately owned???

[John_James]

@James

It was the serpents of Amschel Rothschild, so you’re looking at names like Morgan, Rockefeller, Monty Burns, Satan… You know, the same people who pick the President, and control the interests that control Congress. The scaly lizards that really own the world. Are their names so important? There are always things like them lurking around.

Now you’re not even making sense. The whole point was you were trying to downplay the nature of the Fed’s creation as something “the media just didn’t know was important at the time”.

They are going to control every possible manifestation of the state, so I don’t see why it’s so important that they control the Fed by way of this particular set of lies or that particular set of lies, if you see what I mean.

The whole point of this thread was to ask about the ownership of the Fed, and the first reply suggested there are no private (i.e. outside of government) interests. You’re really taking this outside the scope of discussion.

I mean, it’s laughable to think that you’d fix 'em by, hypothetically, making the US Federal Government the nominal ‘shareholder’ of America’s central bank.

That’s why people like Paul Grignon and Bill Still are not only severely criticized, but are even called possible “plants” of the powers that be.

This was already brought up in these threads:

What do you mean the FED is private?

Money as Debt

“…but governments did not initiate the crisis”