Why?
excellent question! Since you asked, objective and subjective are void concepts unless related to something. And what do they relate to? Is peace, liberty, and justice AJ wants? I don’t know since he only talks about objective and subjective. So he’s on a tangent.
By objective I just mean “right or wrong without reference to any purpose,” i.e., not “right for this purpose” or “wrong for that purpose,” but (apparently) just “right” or just “wrong.” In other words, “right” and “wrong” divorced from any notion of purpose. Please understand that I am not here critiquing the idea that something can just be “wrong,” but that is what I mean when I use the objective/subjective contrast.
If there is a better term for what I mean, let me know and I will consider using it.
See JackSkylark? Void of anything; in relation to nothing. AJ’s on a tangent. It’s a red herring.
*edit: my underline and bold