most, if not all, that passed through the institution I was at and others that I’d visited, you get to see first-hand that when the youth come in their problems are the gang’s over the hill or their parents. Yet in time, even the gang over the hill became their friends on the inside and it was I that was the enemy as I was perceived as a much bigger cause of their problems in time. Many would state, that them being there wasn’t helping them at all but it only solidified their perception that much of the problems that existed back home end up stemming from the state. Though their problems back home would persist, they had a new culprit to blame it on. The gov’t, ie. institutions of cops, judges, social workers, PO’s, etc… only made worse.
If anything, the institutional life they experienced changed one thing, it opened up their minds and they would often verbalize that their problems that happened back home were becoming less and less in comparison to all the hardships the state put them through. The state became a common enemy to what were formerly bitter enemies when they first came to the institution, they turned their attention towards the state. They would even talk about how they couldn’t go back home and be friends like this and sometimes worried how they might appear to others that knew they hung out together. The repeat offenders knew how to play the ropes and the institution was to blame so being there definitely had the reverse effect. Instead of the institution helping, it actually creates it’s own enemies. Just like the over-reaching institutions that imprison the population at large.
I don’t think such a coalition would be necessary. If they both weaken the state from their own angle, then they will reinforce each other without needing any formal relationship.