Here is the crux of the issue, and the problem that seriously needs a solution: the government is completely anti Constitutional so there is little chance that the loophole to cause it to abolish itself is going to happen legitimately. All of these agencies and their respective agents in federal and state governments, including law enforcement, etc. are there to uphold and defend the principles and laws of the Constitution, and they certainly parade that around when they want anything or want to stop things - but it’s clear to any lucid rational being that everything they do is in diamteric opposition to the Constitution.
Therefore, it is factual that they clearly must not mean the United States Constitution, that became supreme law of the land - and by land we mean the United States of America, on March 4, 1789, so they must be referring to some other unknown Constitution with a wholly antithetical set of powers to the USC. In that sense, they are not necessarily traitors to the USC since the USC is moot and irrelevant. Whether they are treasonous to this other, unknown Constitution is unknown, as is whether there is any declaration regarding treason at all.
If this is true, and it is, then this is not our federal government, but a fraud and imposter, and we’re following two different things here, and should be able to disavow this imposter government, which would then leave the United States without any governing body at all - which is actually the best thing that ever happened to us, and it also would mean that these laws we’ve been subjected to are rendered null and void to us as a people…in which case this all boils down to a gang of exploiters using force to enslave a population for their own gains, and which should compel each of us to start taking them out by whatever means necessary because this would fall into the whole “free market” sort of power play for control of the land and resources.
I.e. it boils down to a case of us vs them.
This then, follows the natural order of survival of the fittest and natual selection - which is inherently correct - in which those who are survival oriented will have the advantage over those who are not, which then clears up how and why this entire nightmare got so out of control. It’s no longer about law, order, Constitution, rights, legalities, governance, patriotism, libertarian or anything else. It is about simple survival between two bodies with opposing measures to achieve the same directive: survival.
If we, as a society, are this inept and unwilling to see this for precisely what it is, then we, as a society would be devoured - just or unjust is moot. We will either accept the strength of the competitor or we will destroy the competitor, or do our damnedest to do so…and since most people are lulled into complacency, which is our weakest area, then those who can and will act, should do precisely the same and exploit to destroy their weakest area. It will, regardless, come down to the best and most suited to the environment will have the advantage and will likely survive, while the other, weaker forms die off.
Why NOT consider this strategy in its actual form and set aside the philosophy and the debates and labels, in order to consider hard wired, very real practical means of striking the competitor where it is weakest. The same principle works glaringly so in the whole competition of ideas between parties - those who find the Democratic/Republican parties defective (weak) will automatically move toward compatible ideas until such time as these two power parties lose so much numbers they go out of business, or extinct.
As it stands, there are massive roadblocks in forming a big enough organism of a Libertarian Party to simply overrun the current main parties, but if you’re familiar with viruses, then the “biggest” isn’t necessarily guaranteed a win…only an advantage. We have an advantage only insofar as our immune system can fend off virulent organisms, but the second we start sneezing, we’re not quite the winners after all.
Also, consider that the numbers of the people in this country who are general citizens far, far outnumber the amount of individuals in all facets of governing bodies in every state…yet despite our numbers and size, the smaller governing beast has a stronghold advantage.
The solution can only be to attack its immune system, take away its food…which can be done by the actual numbers of those who are willing to actually take direct and decisive action. In reflecting, we don’t necessarily need the unanimous contribution or approval of every citizen in the country.
We need more to identify the actual immune system and its food source and then attack that - by whatever relevant means required.
Using the Constitution either way would be moot since they do not follow that doctrine anyway, and that is really more distractions, same as protesting, which is basically little more effective than sneezing to make your cold go away.
If we do not intend to go down quietly, maybe evaluating the correct measures to get rid of it, without risking our own survival in the process, is the better way to approach this issue.
Thoughts?
