VDare, which is an anti immigration website disliked by many including the SPLC, claims that the large number of non english speaking economics students meant that the subject of economics had to be come more mathematical and less descriptive to accomodate the fact that the people communicating could not speak the same language.
I personally would add that as they expanded the number of undergraduates they needed to create an easily graded curriculum, that stressed mathematics not writing.
Well, depending on who you ask, the US Federal Reserve is run by British people or aliens, though presumably only the latter would operate in the US itself.
Seriously, though, you raise a good point. It’s true that it was a British man whose theories can be found at the heart of some of the causes behind the global economic recession and the subprime crisis, but it was Americans who were promoting and implementing the policies that led to them.
Thanx for the link. This is a nice, new angle. It’s interesting how a number of factors all contributed together to the crisis. I remember reading a story about Li’s equation in the Toronto star. This article puts alot of things into perspective.
VDare is very anti immigrant but this story is interesting as it suggests a trend in economic theory was caused by lack of communication in a human language. That resulted in highly mathimatical modeling being substituted for other types of thinking.
I suspect the growth of computing power also contributed.
This is related to sub prime as the justification for derivatives is mostly mathematical.
If you went to a university, you would see how many non-western students there are.
Once again, if you attended university you would understand the effect of bell-curving and readjustment of course material to try to fit student grades into a nice range of percentiles. Profs don’t like the outcome were most of their class gets A’s or most of their class gets D’s. It looks bad on them. They try to fit most of the class into the C-B range.
VDare is ok with immigration if you are a white western-european immigrant. If you are non-white you are definitely out of luck.
I’ve had an epiphany about immigration, and I don’t know fully what that means until I have time to digest it. But certainly, these folks are very pro-state, and I no longer believe the argument for immigration enforcement by the state as a second best is a defensible libertarian position.
Ha, you’ll like that Juan. I get less conservative every day.
So what? Ethnicity matters. On a thread last week you said that whites should be concerned about racism against them. And when some ppl are you whine about it?
Some of them are, some of them aren’t. Peter Brimelow is a hard core libertarian. (not an anarchist though) He spoke @ the Private Property and Freedom Society’s third annual conference.
Look at the continuity. The article was arguing that the increase in immigrant students was at least partly responsible for the shift toward a more math based curriculum. This is what you said. I agreed. Then you thought I was arguing something else.
Well, if you did go to university, then you must have had a different experience then I did. I think over half the students are international students @ UOIT.