Wait, what? World Bank seeks Gold Standard debate?

Zoellick seeks gold standard debate

By Alan Beattie in Washington

Published: November 7 2010 22:31 | Last updated: November 7 2010 22:31

Please use the link to reference this article. Do not copy & paste articles which is a breach of FT.com’s Ts&Cs (www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms) and is copyright infringement. Send a link for free or email ftsales.support@ft.com to purchase rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda8f512-eaae-11df-b28d-00144feab49a.html#ixzz14eNYLEtE

Leading economies should consider readopting a modified global gold standard to guide currency movements, argues the president of the World Bank.

Writing in the Financial Times, Robert Zoellick, the bank’s president since 2007, says a successor is needed to what he calls the “Bretton Woods II” system of floating currencies that has held since the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate regime broke down in 1971.

Please use the link to reference this article. Do not copy & paste articles which is a breach of FT.com’s Ts&Cs (www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms) and is copyright infringement. Send a link for free or email ftsales.support@ft.com to purchase rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda8f512-eaae-11df-b28d-00144feab49a.html#ixzz14eNbaLqM

Mr Zoellick, a former US Treasury official, calls for a system that “is likely to need to involve the dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound and a renminbi that moves towards internationalisation and then an open capital account”. He adds: “The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values.”

His views reflect disquiet with the international system, where persistent Chinese intervention to hold down the renminbi is blamed by the US and others for contributing to global current account imbalances and creating capital markets distortions.

This week’s meeting of government heads in South Korea is likely to see yet more exchange rate conflict. A US plan for countries to sign up to current account targets has run into widespread opposition.

Wolfgang Schäuble, Germany’s finance minister, has raised the temperature by describing the US economic model as being in “deep crisis” and criticising the US Federal Reserve’s decision to pump an extra $600bn into financial markets. “It is not consistent when the Americans accuse the Chinese of exchange rate manipulation and then steer the dollar exchange rate artificially lower with the help of their [central bank’s] printing press.”

Although there are occasional calls for a return to using gold as an anchor for currency values, most policymakers and economists regard the idea as liable to lead to overly tight monetary policy with growth and unemployment taking the brunt of economic shocks.

The original Bretton Woods system, instituted in 1945 and administered by the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank’s sister institution, comprised fixed but adjustable exchange rates linked to the value of gold. Controls to restrict destabilising shifts of capital from one economy to another buttressed it.

“The scope of the changes since 1971 certainly matches those between 1945 and 1971 that prompted the shift from Bretton Woods I to II,” Mr Zoellick writes. “Although textbooks may view gold as the old money, markets are using gold as an alternative monetary asset today.”

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

I’m not an expert on the gold standard, but I don’t think “modified” belongs in the analysis. In other words, if it’s not a 100% gold standard, I don’t think it makes much difference compared to what we have today—money remains a poltical tool. This is my understanding at least.

Doesnt sound like hes saying you will be able to get gold for your paper money.

More like he’ll have a chart, and if the price of gold goes up [or down, or stays the same], it will be a signal to print more money.

I see nothing interesting in this for freedom community. It doesn’t matter whether it is 100% gold standard or not. Whether it is modified or not. As long as money is monopolized why does it even matter?

Please use the link to reference this article. Do not copy & paste articles which is a breach of FT.com’s Ts&Cs (www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms) and is copyright infringement. Send a link for free or email ftsales.support@ft.com to purchase rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda8f512-eaae-11df-b28d-00144feab49a.html#ixzz14eNYLEtE

hahahahaha

“I see nothing interesting in this for freedom community. It doesn’t matter whether it is 100% gold standard or not. Whether it is modified or not. As long as money is monopolized why does it even matter?”

So if we all moved to a 100% gold standard you wouldn’t at least be a little pleased about that? I totally agree with you in that the monetary monopoly is bad but at least this would be a step in the right direction, that would really cut down on the powers of the government.

Gipper, why did you infringe their copyright? Why did you choose to do it at LvMI’s liability?

Countries already had monopolized gold standard numerous times in various forms and it always ends in tragedy. I’m not interested in supporting this idea as this is in essence legitimizing politicians as our saviors or at least accepting their decisions as legitimate. Scenario will be the same: World Bank will become worldwide monopoly of issuing gold backed bank notes. Then gold backing will perish due to world state/national states bankrupcy and then we will be royally fucked again. IMHO this scenario is very plausible and I don’t want my kids to live in those kind of times. Compromise in context of liberty is just nice word for slavery.

No law (gold standard is just a law) will cut down government power - law IS government power.

Let’s win this one for the Gipper.

Woops! I didn’t even see that. Take it down?

boniek, examples? I’m not saying we should support or accept the situation as legitimate, I was just saying that we could at least see it as something better off than where we are now with a totally elastic money supply. But even so, you are probably right, even if there was one and it did work a while politicians would find some way to debase it to advance their goals which would end in disaster anyways.

So why is the world bank funding this debate?

Gipper: I usually just link to articles.

Liberty Student: LvMI could help reduce the incentive to copy/paste by making all links in posts “open in new tab”. A simple coding change could do this. Then, when people click on links in posts, they wouldn’t be navigated away from the forum.

Clayton -

Every nation that ever had gold as monopoly money (including US)? It always ends up the same:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADv5-Pen1L4

Gold Reserve Act of 1934 titled all gold held by the Federal Reserve to the US Treasury, not to monopolize it but to remove it from circulating as money. This was the final solution to allow FDR to fund his New Deal programs, but a grand slam for the banks who were vulnerable to bank runs.

US Treasury bonds are payable in US Dollars which were in turn redeemable in gold, along with Federal Reserve notes and Bank notes. The solution was to remove gold.

For myself I wait and pray.

While the US dollar’s days as a reserve currency are clearly numbered, what does the future hold? One thing that’s getting me very worried (and I mean very worried) is that for all their talks Central Banks around the world may hop en masse on the inflationary bandwagon. For all their talk on the US Federal Reserve being run by charlatans they will surely come under pressure from their own governments and their own exporting industries to “adjust” the dollar-yen/euro/whatever exchange rate. Will they yield or will they resist? Are all these talks about finding alternatives to the US dollar just idle talk to keep people from panicking or is there something more serious to it? In this climate of uncertainty (something Marc Faber warned repeatedly about) speculation is running rampant. Central Banks (even the Federal Reserve) know very well we just cannot afford uncertainty, especially in the present climate. Will cooler heads prevail? I wait and pray. I’ve bought my gold and my silver.

boniek, nice video thanks for the share!