Were any of the authors featured at the Misis Institute Christians?
I have noticed that ‘von’ Misis has thrown some stones at Christianity as a whole. I’m not so sure I can take his works seriously given that. So I am looking for alternative authors.
I wouldn’t base any religious bias towards people who have pioneered liberty like authors of the Austrian School have done. It’s rather a lame reason for not taking someone seriously when their theories will stand the test of time and have proven themselves to be giants in the history of human thought. Rothbard, Mises, and Block are athiest if I’m correct. Hayek and Tucker are Catholic, and Lew Rockwell is Christian (I don’t know what denomination), as for the big authors. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.
“I wouldn’t base any religious bias towards people who have pioneered liberty like authors of the Austrian School have done.”
Well I would and that is the point of this thread.
"It’s rather a lame reason for not taking someone seriously when their theories will stand the test of time and have proven themselves to be giants in the history of human thought. "
A theory may or may not ‘stand the test of time’, but will it withstand the tests of Eternity?
“Rothbard, Mises, and Block are athiest if I’m correct. Hayek and Tucker are Catholic, and Lew Rockwell is Christian (I don’t know what denomination), as for the big authors. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.”
Thank you for the list of the authors religios bias, this is what I was asking for.
Why is the author’s religion a factor if they’re writing about economics? You’ll never get anywhere if you only read works by Christian authors due to some aversion to a separate religious bias.
lol at this thread. Nirgraham already said what I wanted to say.
Edit:
There is no such thing as truth contingent upon who said it. Furthermore, I agree with him (and Hazlitt in another book) in that a fundementalist approach to religion, any religion, is socialistic, hence contrary to division of labour.
OP, I can understand your hesitation. I am not sufficiently familiar with Mises’s work to know why he holds a negative view of Christianity. I doubt it has any necessary relation to his economics, though I could be wrong. If it does, the root is probably to be found in his epistemology, which itself is worthy of serious consideration by anyone even remotely interested in economics, imho—regardless of whether an anti-Christian conclusion necessarily stems from it (I, for one, can’t see how this is possible, fwiw.)