Well, you must realize your recent threads are pretty technical, and the OP is decently long and involved. It’s nothing against you or economics discussion, but most people just don’t have the time or the interest to get involved in discussions like that. (Or at least not exactly right when you want them to).
Personally I never looked in those threads because whenever I saw them, that’s just not what I felt like discussing or getting into at the time. In addition, you have to remember a lot of folks on here are in some respects “newbs” who haven’t really gotten as far as Bohm Bawerk and Menger. It’s tough for them to have something to add in something like that. And that kind of time commitment of reading such a long OP, on such a technical aspect, just to determine if they even are able to contribute is a bit of a gamble. Many people just aren’t inclined to invest that kind of time and effort when they may not even end up being to act on it afterward.
And what’s more, even through all that content in those posts, there doesn’t seem to be a clear call to action. Even when one reads through one of your entire OPs, it’s still not completely clear what kind of response is being asked for. Whether you have a specific point you’d like to discuss, or a question on something one of the authors said, or if you’re just interested in hearing what other people think about the passage you read, it’s not very easy to tell. It seems as though it’s the latter, but ultimately, overall, it just seems like you wanted to get your thoughts down in writing and put them out there. For example, in your Menger thread from yesterday. You’ve got an 800 word OP there, and by the end of it, all do is give your personal assessment of everything you’ve just presented, and then say “and here’s another guy who had a paper on it. I think readers here might enjoy it.”
What do you want from us? Again, it seems like you’re more just getting your own thoughts down and putting them out there, which, there’s nothing wrong with it, but you can’t just expect everyone to be in the mood to read everything you’ve written there, read (or re-read) the passage you just happened to feel like talking about (because odds are they didn’t just get done reading it themselves), and then just discuss their random thoughts on it.
That’s a pretty big time commitment and people don’t always have the time for it, or the interest in it.
Obviously this isn’t telling you want to do or where to go, I’m just offering an outsider’s opinion on the reasoning for the lack of responses. It may help you improve on posts. My specific suggestion would be to severly shorten your posts and get to a specific point. Ask a specific question or make a specific request. Outside of a post containing a controversial headline or a shocking video, people need to have an objective in responding. If you’re looking for feedback and discussion, you need to give them that. If you don’t have one for them, then just put your stuff out there for people to read. But don’t get huffy when you don’t get a lot of responses.
Again, you’re writing on a very technical area, and you’re writing a lot. Most people come to these forums for information and to be entertained. No offense to you or the old greats, but a lot of the time, discussing the technical aspects of their technical writings (in a textual medium, no less) is not entirely fun. It’s one thing to have a classroom discussion where everyone has been assigned the text and knows what everyone else is talking about…It’s one thing to have a lunchroom debate about a concept in general and a bunch of back and forth…but it’s another to have a thousand-word opening post about some of the more technical works of economics in a thread in an Internet forum, even if it is the Mises forum.