I doubt it … having a developed philosophic/political opinion is probably what’s correlated with intelligence, not anarchism per se. Besides, this is ancient China we’re talking about, and we simply do not have the data to compare their IQ’s with their Caucasian counterparts.
I’m an anarchocapitalist Asian
Well it is true the gap between asian and white on IQ tests is sorta debatable. But you are correct that the correlation with anarchism is totally my opinion.
I am in agreement with Twistys post.
I could care less if every single Austrian Scholar was Caucasian.
Although, I must admit, I was kinda thrilled when I saw one of them comes from a Latino family (Jesus Soto), I was like, yyyiaaahh, theres hope for my gente still to embrace these economics, hehehehe.
Ideas have no ethnicity
agreed.
Lots of Latino Libertarians, even more Jewish Libertarians, quite a few Asian Libertarians, etc etc
Sorry but really what are you thinking when you just post some trivial fact or opinion you have. It could be true but its not helping. Maybe link me to some research? Maybe a pie chart of libertarians by race? If I started a thread that said “why are all americans fat” and you said “im not fat” or “i know some americans who aren’t fat” that doesn’t help. Really. You are wasting valuable bytes of memory.
where is your pie chart?
My lack of a pie chart does not excuse the inane comments above, does it? If you want to contribute, put some effort into it so the rest of us can learn from you. If you just want attention and have nothing useful to say, prepare to be called out.
But you have no evidence to back up your claim. You also said Ayn Rand was a white guy. I mean put some effort in bro.
My claim is that the comments like the 4 posted above contain no information and are clearly cries for attention.
It was a bad joke. Meant to be inflammatory in a facetious way. My sense of humor is off sometimes though, I admit that.
this whole thread is a cry for attention, just saying
It’s just like the guy who said “libertarianism is a Jewish idea, here are 4 or 5 or whatever important Jews in the libertarian movement, checkmate.” It’s called a composition fallacy.
Says the guy who wrote several posts talking about how his race was the chosen one, with a pact with god, a light to other nations.
There have been some good posts by other members here. I started this thread so I could learn from other members here on the forums. Seems pretty other-oriented to me.
Anyway, its funny that I accuse you of something, and then reference things that you’ve said, while you accuse me of the same thing and provide no evidence. I mean, put some effort in bro.
I wrote one post about the Jewish consciousness. One. And it was written as a response to show how different Jews interpret what their role as a Jew is. That’s why some are libertarians, some are socialists and some probably don’t give a damn.
But look, let’s say I start a thread that says “all libertarians are gays, here are some important libertarian gays therefore there’s something about libertarianism that attracts gays.” That would be nonsensical. How many libertarians are there in the world? Thousands? Millions? You’re going to get a broad cross section of different races, creeds, sexual preferences, men and women etc. You don’t even have proof of claim for a mildly incendiary thread title? Come on.
And then the other longer one you’re probably aware of.
Anyway the number of posts does not preclude it being a cry for attention.
And in doing so got to talk about your holy identity.
Whatever insight your post provided is all well and good. I have no problem with it. You’ll notice that the piece I originally quoted from you contained no information or analysis. Remember my claim is not that all posts on this thread were worthless. Merely that the ones cited were.
Of course. But this is the topic of the thread. You can’t really believe that I literally thought all libertarians where white and male…?
I already said I don’t like the title of the thread. You and I both agree that the OP is pretty lousy. Not much to left to say. You’re lashing out at me for making you feel embarrassed about your inane comment? I mean it was grouped in there with 4 others and probably many more I didn’t have time to look for… you ought not to have taken it personaly.
It seems like you’re incapable of admitting there’s anything wrong with you. Maybe that’s why you can’t accept my criticism. Point blank: Is my criticism wrong?
Is your criticism of what wrong?
Put it this way, my post is just about as useful in refuting your claim as your examples are of validating yours. Neither one of us has any evidence we’re just basing our views on a few observations.
In short, this lousy thread was deserving of my lousy post.
Is there anywhere else on this thread in which i’ve recently quoted 4 different people? Those kinds of posts are useless. They have no educational value to this topic. I want to know what was going through people’s heads when they posted them. Lacking telepathy, I concluded they were attention seekers. Well they got it. Hope you’re enjoying.
They were commenting to Simon Lote.
Except I admit my bad posts. Is this the best you can do? You can’t admit you do stupid things sometimes so the best you can say is “well the things I do aren’t any more stupid than the things you do”. That’s pretty funny dude.
My OP was asking for information. Your posts attempt to provide it. It failed. Although I think we’re both capable of constructive posts.
Yeah when I walk into a third grade math classroom im not stupid if I screw up quadratic equations. Sure. Whatever preserves your positive self image.