By ‘golden parachutes’ I mean the fact that some CEO’s get huge compensation packages even if they run a company into the ground. Stefan Molyneux has a video where he argues that golden parachutes are due to the introduction of income taxes on pay over $1 million, the requirement of CEO compensation being made public, and other such reasons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOHcfiMwlAQ
Is this accurate? Why are there ‘golden parachutes’?
If a company does nto make an attempt to make good on whatever contractual agreement they came to, it may cause problems for them if/when they need to hire a new CEO. They may find their options limited to Men of less quality.
I never thought about the pay being publicized however, that’s rather novel. Quiet frankly if I made that much it is very likely I would never donate anything to anyone. They already give half their pay to the public.
So, I guess it’s just like a supercharged severance package? It seems counterintuitive that people would receive a huge amount of money for doing a poor job. However, maybe that is just the price that has to be paid to attract top talent? Similar to how the POTUS gets a six figure salary for the rest of his life.
In many cases the golden parachute is not a lump cash sum given, but in all sort of other things like stocks, bonds, etc. So I would be willing to bet that IRS tax codes and regulations have created the environment where these packages make the most sense tax wise. For both the corporation and CEO.