The answer to this question is very simple:
Israeli governments are always coalition governments of several parties to get majority, and all but one party in Israel are openly socialist.
U.S. government aid does help Israel, in opinion of socialists. Ultimately, more aid leaves more money for financing social programs, even if enemy countries also get aid, and even more of it, and then use that aid to attack Israel, because aidgivers want to be “fair.”
These socialist parties have bankrupted Israeli economy many times before due to pointless spending and regulation, and foreign aid, mostly, goes to finance programs that really cannot finance themselves.
Thus, even though Arab countries hostile to Israel get more foreign aid than Israel altogether, which they use to buy weapons, and even if Israel would be better off to refuse foreign aid so that there was no excuse to give foreign aid to those hostile countires, no leadership in Israel can ever push for this resolution, because part of this leadership would rather have stupid government spending instead of limiting their actions to “mere” defense, which you would think they should worry most about.
Even Menachem Begin’s government was mixed of capitalists and socialists.
Words of Lichtenberg, “No words exist to convey wisdom to the stupid.” Walter Block is correct, but tragedy is that this argument will never convince socialists to choose between social spending and security, even if it convinces other half of leadership which is not socialist.
No one has ever convinced socialists to abandon their own agenda by writing, no matter how dangerous side effects of their agenda are. No one, in Israel, however, has also entered government without coalition with socialists.
This paradox is not new; it has always been discussed by native Israelis and Jewish Russians when discussing Inter-Israel politics.