@E. R., gay sex isn’t technically sex. “Sex” is sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse is the act of mating. You can’t mate with someone of the same sex, therefore you can’t have sexual intercouse with someone of the same sex. Society calls it “sex” but it’s really just touching genitalia and feeling pleasure. Male/female sexual intercourse will naturally lead to pregnancy. That is it’s primary purpose. Pleasure would be secondary.
Consider a car. It’s primary purpose is to move someone from point A to point B. If I park my car on a hill, and proceed to use it as a bed for the night, am I liable for any damage my car creates when the brakes fail while I’m sleeping and I damage another car or run someone over? I wasn’t using it to move me from point A to point B, but I still parked it on a hill and sat in the driver seat. If someone is responsible for their “negligence” in this case, why wouldn’t they be responsible for their “negligence” in getting pregnant?
Either way this debate goes, I agree that it’s not something that would be easy to enforce in a free society, and it probably wouldn’t be. But abortion also wouldn’t be given the green light by a state, producing a sort of entitlement mentality that women are free to concieve and abort, and how dare anyone criticize or ostracize them for it. It certainly wouldn’t be state incentivized (as in China), but neither would it be culturally acceptable without a state saying it’s okay. You know?