This isn’t true as stated.
This is according to a “points” system (which has been critiqued before on these grounds), which adds a fixed amount of points merely for posting. Only in this manner can it be said that greenbabe contributes more “value” (really, it’s “points”) to the community than Clayton- but it’s per post.
In terms of intellectual coherence, analysis, thoughtful conversation, and sheer volume of output (in the number of posts as well as the amount of writing per post) Clayton’s total contributions qualitatively and quantitatively dwarf the attempts at “contribution” thus far posted by greenbabe.