fyi instructions on how to quote, and other forum tips can be found here.
It seems as though a large part of your disqualification of ideas is that they haven’t worked so far…yet you propose more ideas that have already been tried, with the simply caveat that they haven’t been tried “as often”. I don’t quite see how this works. You’re alleging that something is no good because it hasn’t worked in the past, yet you admit you favor other things that haven’t worked in the past based simply on some arbitrary line you’ve drawn between when something has been tried “sufficiently” to call it a failure versus “hasn’t been tried enough”.
Tell me, where exactly is this line? How many times does something have to be tried before it jumps that shark in your line of reasoning?
Indeed, you yourself identified your own ideas as not effective…and only qualified them by simply saying they haven’t failed enough. I don’t quite see how this is “contributing” anything new in the substantive sense.
So no activism, no business activity, no new nation building…but I need to create freedom tomorrow. Do you have anything to contribute along those lines?
Again, "I need some pragmatic suggestions on how to lose weight, but I don’t want to exercise, change my diet, make any lifestyle changes, go into surgery or in general move or do anything that might cause me to lose weight.
Any suggestions?"
Okay fine, you think declaring your own Petoria in the middle of a globally recognized country, on essentially/ultimately federally owned land, and then abiding by your own law and disregarding those dictates of the surrounding country is a viable solution to create a free society.
Please explain what you will do when heavily armed agents with guns come to collect your property tax.