We had some discussion about this here, and you actually kind of sound like the OP there. I would be interested to hear your own prescription before answering your question, because it sounds like you’re not leaving anything on the table, while at the same time contradicting yourself.
You literally state: “they are looking for Christian minarchsits and basically want to try to create a new micro-state” and then claim “I think this method of acheiving liberty makes sense and is doable.”
Now you tell me “I do not think building islands makes sense. The institute also seems to be minarchistic in their approach and intent.”
This makes no sense. You said the Christian minarchist approach makes sense and is doable, yet you’re complaining that the Seasteading Institute sounds minarchist, and apparently that makes it no good. Plus I don’t understand how one could hope to achieve a “micro-state” (whatever the heck that is) on land that is already claimed by a much larger, globally recognized state.
You also say that I am correct in my assessment of the kind of suggestions you’re looking for (extreme things that are supposed to create immediate freedom or thrust everything forward to an extreme degree, such as creating your own island (figurative or otherwise) paradise), but then immediately tell me you aren’t trying to save the world or transform the nation. So I have no idea what you’re looking for.
What exactly do you believe is feasible and worthwhile?