So, this question occurred to me last night. I’m not sure it’s what happened, but pretend for a minute, just to get to the question. Suppose you were President, and without your agreement, you found out that your military officials had trained a group of Cubans to invade and defeat Castro, and that presently, those Cubans were invading, with American air support. As a non-interventionist, you are horrified. Would you call off the air support? If you don’t call it off, you’ve basically invaded another country, and you don’t want to do that. If you call it off, thousands of anti-Castro Cubans will die, and you will have aided, in some sense, a Communist dictator. What would you do?
I don’t see how this would all somehow go down without Mr. Libertarian Prez knowing, but I would keep on the air strike I think. Read Block’s recent “Is There an ‘Anomalous’ Section of the Laffer Curve?”
Order the air support to pound your military officials.
Great stuff. Thanks for linking.
I don’t think it backs up your solution to the OP’s answer though. As the president your first duty is to try not to provoke a war with Cuba and with the Soviet Union. So as the president you should call of the air support and do everything you can to convince Castro that this was not sanctioned by you. So by Block’s thesis I would say you actually have more reason to order the air support to help out the Castro’s forces than to keep them on their present mission.
I would have ordered the air support, something deep inside tells me that leaving a genocidal socialist dictator in power is not proceeding ever more boldly against evil.
And here I thought this thread was going to be about Marc Houle’s Bay of Figs…