Yeah, I didn’t mean to imply that you did. But yeah, I was making the (some what sarcastic) remark that if we are to not allow women to wear burqas because they are anti-liberating, then women should be forced to go naked so that they can be completely liberated. Lol.
Wearing a symbol of woman degeneration is betraying all the brave women that have been raped and/or killed for taking off their burqa and dressing modestly.
Besides, it’s a security problem because you see NOTHING of the person. A hockey mask isn’t like that. Murderers, thieves and other criminals can simply hide behind a burqa.
But its only a symbol of female degeneration to YOU. Not everyone feels that way- including many women. There’s plenty of women that get raped and killed while dressing very skimpy- lets ban all skimpy clothes too?
So then your idea of a libertarian society is where ALL kinds of full cloaks are banned no matter who wears it? No one is very mobile in a burqa either so you’re being pretty silly man.
I meant that women have been killed for taking off their burqa and dressing skimpy. Nobody have been killed for wearing a burqa.
Yes, but as long as you can see the face, it’s not a problem. Not complete libertarianism in other words. Something must be sacrificed for these degenerated women.
Damn it! The property rights in all your questions are always ill-defined. Whose “public” are you talking about? Under libertarianism, all property is private, thus it is up to the owner of said land to determine whether people can dress like soldiers, police officers, or naked people. Thus, you ask stupid questions.
So the Rocky Mountains, the bottom of the sea, the sahara desert etc will be public property in a libertarian society, and hence you should be able to wear police clothes here?