Of the most recent babble I have taken part in the other person spewed this statement, “Under Communism, there is no state”. I’ve debated people many times when communism is brought up, and when the Soviet Union was brought up, whether or not it’s a State. I’ve even heard people claim that Marx wasn’t a communist, from a communist. (I’ve even had people tell me communism and anarchism are synonymous.) There are some points I’d like addressed as best as possible.
Is communism a State and why?
Are socialism and communism synonymous?
Was the Soviet Union communist?
Was Marx a communist?
These questions may sound a bit “stupid”, but I need some good clarification and points next time I get involved in these types of conversations.
A case could be made that the 1st anarchists were people who brought an unsatisfactory chaos and disorder to the ancient Greeks that we know of who used the word,
Well if you can find such a people that existed before 4th century BC. Unless such a person or persons can be found then I think the first person is actually the one who called for the concept of no rule, not really the person who invented the word for it.
That’s a given. Beyond not being able to construct an intelligent argument, their grammar was horrible. Regardless if it’s a chatroom, proper grammar is a must.
It is how the word is used in ancient greek texts, where the word derives from. I think the word is most likley similarliy used in anything before William Godwin used the phrase in a positive light (?). I do not think the term was used in a positive light before that. I am not arguing with the concept of “anarchism” as a term the way people at Mises.org would define the use, I am just pointiong out what I find an interesting tidbit in the history of the word, which has been in use for over a millenia.
Communism, according to the traditional definition, is a socioeconomic system characterized by the abolition of money, markets, and the state. To that end, the term “communist state” is a Western contrivance, as not even the self-described socialists governing those countries believed that they were “communist” in nature. Whether they were socialist is a more complicated issue, but none of them described themselves as having established “communism.”