Debate between Objectivist, minarchist libertarian and anarchist libertarian.

About Announcements
1

I really do not get the differences that Objectivists have with libertarianism and especially I do not get Ayn Rands critique. To get it more clear I would like to hear a debate between:

  1. An objectivist like Yaron Brook.

  2. A minarchist libertarian (if there are any?). I would say that even Ron Paul is really an anarchist if it comes down to it. :slight_smile:

  3. An anarchist libertarian like Stefan Molyneux (or Hans Hoppe but he does not seem to be a debater).

Note that a debate between anarchist Stefan Molyneux and Minarchists Michael Badnarik and Jan Helfeld have already taken place, where the discussion centered mainly on issues from effect (consequentialism):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gK2xB9F9Ag

Also there is a small debate between Yaron Brook and anarchists here:

I like to see the debate focus on good and evil, so morality. This probably excludes group 2 because those people are usually consequentialists. But I like to know what the poblem is that Objectivists have with minarchist libertarians and with anarchist libertarians. I suspect that it has to do with ethics.

2

Libetarianism -vs- Objectivism By Walter Block

http://reasonpapers.com/pdf/26/rp_26_4.pdf

This is a response to Peter Schwartz’s, a current head in the Objectionist movement, critique on Libetarianism…

3

Anarchism as Constitutionalism: A Reply to Bidinotto -Roderick Long