Agreed. He has almost nothing to gain from addressing it. Tom Wood’s objections notwithstanding (some mentioned at the link included in this post), Paul’s campaign is doing a lot of the right things. According to Paul 90% of his time has been spent in Iowa and New Hampshire, and the local campaigns there seem to be doing quite well. Again I think there would be much to gain from taking some Woods suggestions into consideration, but by and large I think they’re doing it right.
He does well in Iowa, and NH or SC, and the “electability” “issue” will take care of itself.