*** December 2012 low content thread ***

@ Anemone

I actually think that is a good strategy. Politics is the art of executing a dialectic. See the problem? Here’s the solution! Unfortunately, it’s only a good strategy when the counterpunch is actually smart deregulation, de-licensing, lower taxes and a credit and money supply determined by the market.

This kind of reminds me of the popular notion of the good economy of the Clinton Era, despite the congress being republican majority for that period. It makes me wonder what the economy would be like without the republicans’ largely illusory struggle to preserve the market.

The nurse that was fooled by a horrible impersonation of Her Majesty and gave up medical information about Kate was found dead.

Allegedly, it was suicide, but yeah… she was probably killed to send a message to nurses, doctor’s, etc. to not reveal personal information about Her Majesty’s family.

http://gma.yahoo.com/nurse-hoaxed-queens-call-found-dead-145123666--abc-news-topstories.html

Wheylous,

There are multiple things those words can mean when put together. Could you hint as to which one you meant?

Students For Liberty

@The Muffinburg: Wow, that is really… wow. I listened to the prank call and I’m withholding judgment on whether this was necessarily a murder. I imagine that the nurse received dire threats and intimidation from the hospital administration (“Your career is over, you’ll never work again” kind of thing) and it is conceivable that Saldanha could have been driven to suicide by this. By the way, I’m curious about her immigration status. While the royals take their privacy deadly seriously, I imagine they receive the majority of their medical care by means of private doctors anyway. When I first heard of Kate’s hospital visit, I immediately thought it was a publicity stunt, a convenient way to convey the impression that “royals use the NHS, too, just like everybody else”.

But I can assure you those radio hosts’ careers are over and I would be surprised if the royal family doesn’t have this seen to - not so much because they breached royal privacy (which, in Kate’s case, isn’t really that big of a deal, apparently) - but because they wantonly mocked and ridiculed the Queen’s and Crown Prince’s persons. Moral of the story: Think twice before mocking a monarch, her successor and his successor in a country whose government belongs to that monarch.

Clayton -

Some great new Holiday tunes from your friends at EconStories, the produces of the Keynes vs. Hayek rap battle:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uKnd6IEiO0

@The new EconStories video

I absolutely burst out laughing when they cracked the Santa/Bernanke joke

For easy viewing:

It really impresses me how simple they make those concepts seem. I was struggling in my Macro class this week trying to figure out whether the economy is demand-driven or supply-driven and their video made it immediately clear to me.

Supreme Court will take up gay marriage cases

Obama asks Congress for $60.4B in Sandy aid

Chemical weapons risk: Syrian missiles and shells

Viral rapper PSY apologizes for anti-US protests

Corporate money to help pay for Obama inauguration

Long-sealed Notorious B.I.G. autopsy released

Rand Paul Explains His Vote In Favor Of Sanctions On Iran

The Attack on Revolution PAC and Tom Woods

A Journey Down The Road to Serfdom Begins With a Single Step

Starving for Historical Accuracy

Schiff on the 91% Tax Rate Propaganda

Obamacare architect leaves White House for pharmaceutical industry job

The US and Israel: a short quiz on ‘rogue nation’ status

Laptop seizures by US government highlight 9/11-era climate of fear

Progressive media claims they’ll be ‘tougher’ on Obama now

Bradley Manning: a tale of liberty lost in America

AP’s dangerous Iran hoax demands an accounting and explanation

Forget Benghazi and Focus on What Matters

Obamacare: The Resistance Endures

Leave Cuba Alone

U.S. Court of Appeals Rejects CIA’s Motion to Squash Lawsuit on Bay of Pigs History

AnCap explained in one simple image:

Wow nice, Wheylous. Is that yours or did you find it?

Found it on FB.

I wasn’t sure. It reminded me of that video you posted recently about the same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1Yek6mzV3w

Just discovered this. Go to about 3:46 if you want to see Bob Murphy…singing…on stage…

Bill Whittle video: Unserious People

BitInstant may be aiming for a Bitcoin debit card, but it looks like a European Bitcoin exchange will beat it to the punch. After working with French financial regulators, Bitcoin-Central has hammered out a deal with French payment processor Acoba and France’s Credit Mutuel bank to become a payment service provider, which allows it to function much like a bank. According to Bitcoin-Central, it’s the first exchange of the digital currency to be licensed to operate as a bank and function within the framework of European regulations. Customers will now have funds held under their name – rather than that of the exchange – at Credit Mutuel and insured by the Garantie des dépôts, the French analog of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). Soon, users of the service will be able to order debit cards that can use Bitcoins and Euros for purchases and cash withdrawals. Yearning for some direct deposit action? In a few months, the organization will be able to accept direct deposits and even automatically convert hard-earned cash into Bitcoins. The virtual bullion has taken its lumps, but this is a development that fans of the currency can be proud of. For more details, tap the bordering source link.

Wow this is really interesting. Proudhon and Bastiat debated one another.