It is necessarily true since otherwise one couldn’t evaluate the truth value of the question “Is LFW true?” because you could only conclude what you >>were determined to do which gives no foundation for truth
This is a non- sequitur…
You are in cast iron laws, do you say that a robot cannot have access to a ‘correct fact’ labelled as such in its databank simply because it is a program run on silicon ?
since fallible determinism gives no foundation for truth we must again reject determinism.
a persons knowing some truth is dependant on
- the existance of some knowable truth
- their ‘recognising/’ ‘appreciating’ /understanding’ ‘accepting’ of that truth (through what ever process of evidence and argument that they are determined to require
There is no need for a 3) they have a self-causing will outside of the nexus of cause and effect
- has literally no-bearing on the matter, and the way it has been described is entirely spooky.
Similarly this stuff about the incompatablism between determinism and ‘choice’ is mistaken. Being determined creatures in a deterministic universe does not make it impossible to adopt an intentional or teleological stance, we can be determined to do so ! hence choice/agency are still accessible to us.
What is your relationship with ‘your’ basic and self-causing will ?
.