Economics about to change by 2030.

Economics Economics Questions
1

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=a1Uh.Y.6OQ04&refer=germany

TWO EARTHS NEEDED BY 2030 TO KEEP OUR DEMANDS.

As the pie shrikns (above link) the only way to make yourself better off is to take a bigger share from the shriking pie.

And the only way to do this is called WAR.

We better start thnking on WARCONOMICS for the future ahead or pray 2012 doomsday is true.

2

I hear libertarians are big fans of war, in any case a topic about this already exists.

3

Mutual Cooperation > Predation

4

True my friend. But remind me when was the last time humanity cooperated to engange in any activity other than war.

5

Ummm… Trade in the market? Assuming a free society, just about everyone would engage in some form of trade. This, in a way, is mutual cooperation.

6

Discussion forums maybe?

7

DUDE EITHER GET A JOB TO KEEP YOU BUSY OR DONT READ AND POST ANYTHING ON WHATEVER I WRITE. PLEASE!!!

8

Uh… wtf?

9

But this has nothing to do with markets. Did you read the article??

10

You’re quite correct, scarcity and economics have nothing to do with one another, silly us for thinking otherwise.

11

You can bring result about without my help, you just have to stop posting. Win - win, right?

12

Since you have a lot of time…Could you let every living economist the above statement??? It is very important for us to know that since ECO-201 we have been WRONG.

13

You’re about a step away from being banned, so I’d recommend you calmed down.

-Jon

14

You seem to be unaware of sarcasm :\

15

This is the first time I write anything directly to you. The guy I replied the quote above bothers me every time with non sense comments. I repeat “he has a lot of time to do this” TWICE I have asked him just to stay away from me. One in a private message and this public one.

And you come now threatening me with banning???

Thanks for your time.

16

Consider yourself warned.

-Jon

17

You need to grow up, right now, & deal with the fact that you can’t control other’s actions.

18

I doubt it. Please back up your statement.

19

I would like to, but your slightly fragmented english clouds my abiltiy to respond.

I was under the impression you took Giels seriously when he remarked: “You’re quite correct, scarcity and economics have nothing to do with one another, silly us for thinking otherwise.”

The later part of the above sentence (of Giels) seems to point to sarcasm.

20

But maybe you can read the link (Original) from this post and comment about it. The article has no fragmented English words and your mind will a lot of ability to respond intelligently.