Perhaps the best line from all of this non-sense was this statement:
Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, said Greenspan had ``the authority to prevent irresponsible lending practices that led to the subprime mortgage crisis.‘’
Forgive me if I am wrong, but the two comments previous to me are left by the kind of totally irrelevant economists that make reading these forums unbearable. Is there anyway we can stop this?
The most disappointing statement yet from him. I love the 60s Greenspan. In his memoirs he mentions ‘Gold and economic freedom’ and ‘Antitrust,’ but not ‘The assault on integrity,’ which is a beautiful refutation of any regulating practices.
I am not an economist.
I signed up on this forum less than two weeks ago exactly because I wish to learn Economics. Most of my other posts actually have a more serious tone. This is a forum, not a thesis dissertation. I little sense of humor sometimes does not harm anyone.
And what I meant is that I perceived that during his last term in office, Mr. Greenspan seemed more concerned on the media coverage than on the actual impact of economics policies he was applying.
Whether or not you agree with my opinion is irrelevant. I am expressing an opinion, not proving mathematical truth.
Prefacing a response with “Dude” is a great way for instant respect. Some of us greatly appreciate and respect these forums and like to use them to toss around genuine ideas and thought, and I for one would love it if we could keep things relatively learning based.
Also, if you are so new, how in the name of God do you have an MVP below your name?