It might not get approval from the mainstream but people would be forced (for lack of a better word) to listen to what he was saying.
“It might not get approval from the mainstream but people would be forced (for lack of a better word) to listen to what he was saying.”
Televisions have power buttons, news articles can be glossed over. Just because they are constantly presented with liberty-orientated ideas does not infer they will somehow break from it and really is that what libertarians want? To beat the opposition by mere utterances of the arguments? By simple volume?
I’ll take what I can get. Sure I’d love to have a national debate that everyone watches where austrian economists refute the free-market myth, accuse the Military Industrial Complex, reveal the expansion of executive powers, reveal the houses of Morgan and Rockefeller in American politics and economy, etc. This will likely not happen. Ron Paul is the best thing we have. I don’t understand what you would want or expect to start changing people’s minds. We’ve got good arguments here, with little volume. I guess that hasn’t been very effective.