just do not get me banned if i start to win in some of my arguments. It is always nice to provide individuals with oppurtunitues to present their views .
thanks.
just do not get me banned if i start to win in some of my arguments. It is always nice to provide individuals with oppurtunitues to present their views .
thanks.
It is that arrogence that will get you banned.
What does any of this have to do with economics?
This should be interesting…
Become a pest, and you’ll be gone quicker than a puff of smoke.
I’m intrigued - although I’m wondering if a non liberterian who thinkgs they’ll “win” their arguments here is capable of understanding liberterian arguments. Presumably if you were capable of understanding our arguments you’d be a liberterian (either that or you’d be just plain evil ![]()
If.
What are you then, exactly?: Liberal, Authoritarian, Big Gov. Conservative, Socialist, ect,
Nothing specific, but non-libertarian can mean a lot of things.
One post and he is gone! Poof!
Its not the number of posts, but the points earned from them. He’s got 95 pts and counting for one post! He has defeated us all…
Now now, no need to start throwing around banning threats - even if they are goaded from the poster. I dont see why we ban anyway.
I ban trolls, and if he is one, he’s gone. The last person who wanted to “debate” (read: troll/flame) on here definitely suffered such a fate…
You’ll have plenty of people clamoring to debate you so I don’t want to pile on here but if you want to debate just one on one let me know and I’ll give you my email.
Oh I’ll get you good!
I am not sure if you are referring to my post. I am just observing that he made one post about how he is going to debate, and then said nothing else.
I disagree with the phrase big government because not only is based on perception but it is also vauge. Furthermore the Phrase Big government vs Small government is not only vauge but constitutes a false dilema of the highest order.
Why do individuals in the group ban trolls if they only contradict the members in this group?
doing such a thing would probably lead to confirmation bias.
For the most part, we’re not against big government. We’re against coercive government. Do you disagree with that phrase?
Trust me, no matter how many trolls are banned, this group will never have confirmation bias. lol
Merely semantics, the dichotomy of big vs. small government does have its critical flaws, the Austro-libertarian position would generally to replace it with a dichotomy of government vs. anarchy (an action I personally favor), but it still has its uses.