I might as well jump in feet first here - Social Security destroyed American sovereignty

Miscellaneous Newbies
21

" All corporations are government creatures."

Did government create Google? Are you comparing Google to the Fed?

The corporation entity is indeed a government intrusion into the free market, but that doesn’t make your analogy correct.

We have this organization that calls itself the Government that forces itself upon us and compels us under the threat of force to buy its services. We can talk about the degree of how much this organization intrudes and violates private property, and to what extent these violations affect the institution of private property.

Anyhow, your false analogy isn’t even consistent with your original claim that the Fed owns the government. You seem to be now implying that the government owns everything. I can almost agree with that one.

"Since the shareholders of the FED are dealing in counterfeit money, it’s easy enough to identify who bankrupted the gov’t. "

It’s like this. The government is suffering from obesity, so it has used it’s magic powers to create a McFed with “unlimited” resources (at your expense) to make as many big Macs as required to satiate it’s never ending hunger.

Now according to you, McFed is a private institution that has made the government fat.

22

I’m just trying to figure out how my application for a social security number made me a citizen of Puerto Rico, a resident of Puerto Rico, AND a member of the Merchant Marine.

No, I will not go to your blog for further explanation and/or detail. I’ll make the assumption that it reads like your posts to this thread, which means it will only make my headache worse.

23

Pretty interesting scholarship Larry. There are a lot of libertarians who are interested in the legal nonsense of the state, because it helps to convince people who aren’t yet anarchists or radical libertarians.

Thanks for posting.

24

Okay. I went to the blog. Yes, my headache got worse. How long did it take you to go through all that law and actually interpret it to the degree that you have so far?

25

I’m sure what I have discovered is giving a lot of people headaches - I know the DOJ and the Federal Courts are in that bunch.

I was indicted, tried, and convicted for “willful failure to file” in 2001 for the years 1994-1996. Since I had received a letter from the IRS stating that I was “not legally required to file” for the year 1993, I couldn’t possibly be “willful”. The gov’t falsified records in the Social Security self-employment records and in the Individual Master File transcripts, committed perjury, and suborned the perjury. I have Freedom of Information Act responses from both the SSA and the IRS that evidence all of these felonies.

So I was sentenced to 2 years in prison camp (for nothing but misdemeanor counts). I met a few paralegals and lawyers there who started me down this trail. One of the most important things I learned immediately is that the indictment must go to the particulars. That’s when I realized that the word “resident” must have some hidden message.

I started studying the Code and to my delight (as delighted as I could be in prison camp) I discovered that the United States Code is a very large software system. I’m an independent computer consultant/software engineer with lots of years of experience with software systems consisting of over millions of lines of code.

After 9 years now, I have been able to put together the Social Security Scam.

I’m now challenging the constitutionality of the Act of Congress approved on March 3, 1791, that initiated “internal duties” in the U.S. This Act taxed stills and the stills’ distillate. It is an intrastate tax and, therefore, unconstitutional. This Act also evidences that its collectors are within the Customs Service - the ATF. The IRS collects income tax paid by collectors of “internal duties” (Act of Congress approved August 5, 1861, within an importing Act). So, the IRS is also within the Customs Service.

This Act (3/3/1791) is the basis of ALL of the federal regulatory agencies. Once this tumbles, it will be like dominoes.

So far, both the District Court and the Appellate Court (interlocutory appeal) have failed to do their most sacred duty - ruling on the constitutionality of an Act of Congress. The Courts and the DOJ are now conspiring to try to prevent me from exercising my right to appeal.

I’m just trying to get everyone to understand the Social Security Scam. Thanks for getting a headache. Please pass the word.

26

Crankdom.

27

Thanks for the comment. I’ve been preaching to the choir, so to speak, but now I want to move into larger groups. I’m looking to find some good libertarian websites. Any suggestions would be welcome.

28

As they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.

29

How could there be any corporation without a government? A corporation has to fill out government forms to exist. It matters not if said corporation is considered a “government corporation”, because a corporation exists to get tax benefits. A corporation is not something that would exist in a true free market environment, but then none of us have ever witnesses a free market.

I"m not here to quibble about the FED or corporations.

My Post here is titled, in part, “Social Security destroyed American sovereignty”. That’s what I have to offer for everyone. It doesn’t matter whether the FED or Joe or Bob is behind the bankruptcy. In fact, to understand the Social Security Scam it doesn’t matter about the bankruptcy at all.

Applying for a S.S. # causes the applicant to be considered a “taxpayer”, a “U.S. citizen”, and a “U.S. resident”, subject to all of the Socialistic federal regulatory agencies. This is the message that everyone needs to understand. It’s what the Federal Courts are basing their rulings upon and what the DOJ using as the basis of its prosecutions.

30

There is nothing wrong with what you’re doing Larry. Some of the anarchist kids will say this is crankdom because they find it much more productive to criticize people on the internet than to get out and challenge the state directly.

Always waiting for someone else to take the first step. It’s always someone else’s fault that things are as they are.

Sadly, I’m not sure they realize that you can’t create a libertarian society until everyone takes responsiblity for their own liberty, and engages in some form of meaningful pedagogy, of which writing “crank” doesn’t qualify.

31

" How could there be any corporation without a government? "

Is this referring to me?

Because I didn’t say that the corporation could exist without a government.

32

I’d also like to point out that Marc Stevens, who is in my opinion, one of the most productive and interesting voluntarists, is an expert with state law, and is able to turn it inside out in order to achieve more liberty for people who are being oppressed by the state, under the pretense of those laws.

He uses the state’s own rules against itself. This is brilliant.

What Larry is talking about is not too far removed from what Marc Stevens does. And it is heroic as far as I can tell.