Don’t mind me, just some Sociology ideas I’m playing with.
- Some individual personalities will never get along
yes
- Individuals with personal problems distort their ends, and utilities. They need to get help to achieve ends with little error.
yes
- Individuals with personal problems would rather persist with them, then get help. There problems are a result of conditioning.
yes
- Such individuals are screwed for life, and aren’t stable in relationships(friendship or romantic) and therefore because another individual is required for a relationship, the other individual, possibly even stable, will be less an individual to have a relationship with. Therefore, some are condemned to being alone.
Research suggests that screwed up people can be “happily” [for them] married to other screw ups, if their screw ups fit. Simple example would be a sadist marrying a masochist. You get the idea.
- Individuals, most, aren’t capable of rational logical decisions, and often let emotions distort reasoning.
I would agree had you said “some”. What is your evidence for “most”?
As for emotions “distorting” reasoning, yes and no. The guy who tosses a a cream pie in his his boss’s face and gets fired to live the life of the homeless, which in a rational mood he would not have done, there I agree with you.
But many a time emotions enhance reasoning, by which I mean that when we have a feeling about something there is no rational reason for, it’s not to be sneezed at.
I hate to say but a good majority of people have problems, that only they can get help for. Its not possible to help or change someone remotely with your influence.
I disagree. People are influenced by good treatment in the long run. Maybe they won’t be be 100%, but they will be better than before.
This might distort the free market, because how is a workplace supposed to function with shitty individuals?
_The free market plays with the hand it is dealt. Just as some countries have a wealth of oil or gold o_r whatever, and others have very little, so too some countries labor markets will have shitty individuals and others will have less. This is not a distortion of the market.
If, weighing the profits they cause and the losses they cause, the employer concludes they are paid more than they are worth, they get the sack. If they are worth more, they stay. Both these things happen all the time, I think.
The production will diminish if Worker A always gets into an argument with Asshole Worker B and therefore work and production through the means of such employment is desired less.
yes.
The problem with people imo, is their attitudes and shitty personalities, not their actions.
Sounds like you have someone particular in mind.
Someone who kills can be a good person, but just does terrible actions.
If we define “good person” in a very unusual way never considered before, yes.
What if these terrible actions, are used as force against terrible people? Would society therefore be a better place?
If we accept what seems to be the thrust of your post, that a “terrible person” is one with an atitude and a shitty personality, and “terrible actions” means “murder”, you are asking “Should nasty unpleasant people who distort the market and interfere with production be murdered?”
Of course they should. Line em up against the wall and have at it. You fucking retard.
What if, even more, individuality was diminished,
Some people consider this as the very essence of diminishing the quality of life.
therefore everyone would be forced to cooperate because their life depended on it. Would society be a better place?
Have you ever gone to a govt school? Or the military? Would you want your whole life to be like that, taking stupid orders, forever?
There wouldn’t be any assholes, pricks, or bitches interfering with a man’s means, and diminishing the quality of his/her life.
The post started so logically and understandingly, and ended up like this.