Well, here’s what I’ve seen so far.
So does that, and I use the term loosely, comic-strip, make the case that civilization is evil or that it is not evil?
Why do you think civ isn’t evil?
Because I’ve seen no evidence that it is.
We all know civilization in its current form is evil. Thing is, everyone knows what needs to be done.
We need to stop global population growth.
We need one world government.
We need mass migration from malnourished regions to Europe and America.
We need those “take one” condom boxes in high schools to have imperative sentences.
We need welfare to be conditional on neutering.
We need mandatory abortions for teen pregnancies.
We need to institute a one child policy and abort 50% of all female fetuses.
We need to ban all religion and mandate the teaching of evolution in schools.
We need to nationalize the oil industry and use the proceeds to fund said abortions and bibleburnings.
Most importantly, we need to eliminate the electoral college.
Thing is, it’s never brought up.
Thing is, people watch Alex Jones.
Thing is, the world is full of libertarians.
Thing is, people are still buying gold.
Thing is, liberalism is associated with Mao.
Thing is, people reject consequentialism.
Thing is, people cling to rights-based morality.
Thing is, the Illuminati is an excuse.
Thing is, people are lazy.
And that’s why they don’t want to acknowledge it.
We all know civilization in its current form is evil. Thing is, everyone knows what needs to be done.
We need to stop global population growth.
We need one world government.
We need mass migration from malnourished regions to Europe and America.
We need those “take one” condom boxes in high schools to have imperative sentences.
We need welfare to be conditional on neutering.
We need mandatory abortions for teen pregnancies.
We need to institute a one child policy and abort 50% of all female fetuses.
We need to ban all religion and mandate the teaching of evolution in schools.
We need to nationalize the oil industry and use the proceeds to fund said abortions and bibleburnings.
Most importantly, we need to eliminate the electoral college.
Thing is, it’s never brought up.
Thing is, people watch Alex Jones.
Thing is, the world is full of libertarians.
Thing is, people are still buying gold.
Thing is, liberalism is associated with Mao.
Thing is, people reject consequentialism.
Thing is, people cling to rights-based morality.
Thing is, the Illuminati is an excuse.
Thing is, people are lazy.
And that’s why they don’t want to acknowledge it.
lol you must be a troll.
No we must leave civilization and then watch it crash on its own. Escape the NWO by being self-sufficient.
False. Population growth will level out on its own. Wealthy societies tend to have fewer children. What’s needed is more wealth around the world, which means more capitalism around the world.
It sounds instead like you’re advocating aggressive means of ‘stopping population growth.’ All evil uses aggression as its means, which means you are, right now, part of the problem of evil in the world.
LMAO, we need control of the entire planet to rest in a single point? You would never see such power, and thereby such tyranny, in the whole of human history.
You’re going to force people to do this? Again, that would make you evil.
So now we’re forcing birth-control on people? Again, you choose an aggressive solution–which means you are evil.
Rather than repudiate welfare, you want to force a choice of sterilization or starvation. You are evil.
Force again. Evil again.
Force again, evil again.
Force again.
Force again. Intolerance again.
Because…? That would honestly change nothing.
If this is what he’s advocating, then he is evil.
And?
Fairly sensible to buy a commodity as hedge against these stupid fiat currencies we have lying around.
So? Liberalism is the avante garde of fascism\communism today. Mao was communist, but his inheritors became fascists, because the left worldwide has by and large realized their communist-economics is a complete failure and have bowed to reality. However, they refuse to give up central control of society. That leaves them with a fascistic system of central control and limited private ownership subject to the whims of the state.
If you believe anything you’ve written here, you are evil, and I urge you to take a look at the NAP.
You call me evil, but you know it’s the only fast way to bring down the fertility rate.
Freedom, I’m glad you’re not having kids. Let me know if you need any spam or shotgun ammo and I’ll hook you up.
And beating my wife is the fastest way to have my wife beaten…
He’s obviously a socialist/marxist but what he says is true.
We don’t need to kill everyone. We just need to be self-sufficient and let civ collapse on its own.
dat video.
Very entertaining, thanks for posting.
Fertility rate does not need to be brought down. That’s the flaw in your thinking. In any case, good intentions and good ends can never rehabilitate evil means.
It would do a lot to reduce inequality and bring the US education system to developed country standards if family sizes were manageable and contraception was readily available.
You’re a libertarian, right? Well, for every dollar Medicaid spends giving people contraceptives, many more dollars are saved from not providing welfare and healthcare to the extra welfare recipient who would have been born.
It would do a lot to reduce inequality
Why is that a good thing? Inequality is liberty, equality is tyranny. Ever read Rothbard?
And we don’t need to reduce the global population. Civ is collapsing as we speak. We should be focused on survival if we want to survive the collapse and escape gov./corporate tyranny and poisoning.
lol you must be a troll.
Holy Crap! I actually think I may be in agreement on F4me on something
I had to quote that.
It’s true. Equality is force.
More reason I see civ as evil. Large cities breed a demand for equality which leads to statism.
Civ = collectivism = statism
Rewilding = freedom
It is welfare and medicaid that need to be ended, not the lives of people taking advantage of them.
A man gathers 5 berries. Another man also gathers 5 berries. They’ve gathered the same amount of berries. They are in a state of equality. Who is using force against whom?
[quoteuser=“excel”]
A man gathers 5 berries. Another man also gathers 5 berries. They’ve gathered the same amount of berries. They are in a state of equality. Who is using force against whom?
[/quote]
LOL, your only criteria for “equality” is the number of berries everyone has?
This would mean that men are naturally superior to women, considering most are born with two…