On this week’s Stossel: “Stossel interviews Jeff Tucker, author of “Bourbon for Breakfast”, who writes about federal rules that make showers weak, water tepid, dishwashers that don’t work, and light bulbs that people don’t want.”
Great, now we just need Stossel to come out of the closet as an anarchist
Napolitano has said he is but on his show he’s a Tea Party kiss ass. He never talks about anarchy. I don’t think Stossel is an anarchist anyway and if he was it probably wouldn’t do him any good to say so.
It’s completely understandable why the aforementioned persons could only pay lip-service to the full ideals of liberty. I’d much rather have them on the airwaves promoting some kind of liberty discourse rather than none at all.
They would probably lose their positions at fox.
He’s Jeffrey on Fox with the judge.
The Fox media player is crap, the preceding advertisment works, but I can never get the actual snippet to work. In any case, I enjoyed the by-line to the piece: “How to avoid the “Statist” quo!”
Dammit, I hate Erin Brocovich.
When/where did Napolitano say Stossel was an anarchist? JW.
Judge: Can we ever have a government that works?
Jeffrey: NO!
Brilliant!
@Wesker
He’s said it a few times.
Which night will Tucker be on?