That’s an important thing to hint at. That’s something you learn in Foreign Policy 101, yet not many people think about it. States exist in a matter of anarchy. Any statist ought to be for one-world government if they are a) so afraid of anarchy and b) believe that there should be one rule for one people and any boundaries between peoples would be arbitrary (and I don’t say that in a conspiratorial context ).
Leeson’s latest article in The Freeman tackles such ideas: http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-law-merchant-and-international-trade/.
Did anyone read the comments at the bottom of Leeson’s article. Emily’s comment peaked my curiosity so I did some searching and found this http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2643&context=alea I admit I only skimmed it but what are some of your opinions on it?