As a libertarian living in the , I note a striking lack of a cohesive community of libertarians in this country. Why is this?
For example, why hasn’t any prominent British libertarian written and published an introductory book into libertarianism? Wouldn’t this be an effective tool to market libertarian values to the wider population?
Why is there no British Lew Rockwell.com or Strike-The-Root.com? Shouldn’t there be some kind of hub in which British libertarians can air and share ideas?
Why aren’t there any attempts to reach out to young people? And no, it isn’t true to state that young people are universally leftist. There must be some younger people who are open to libertarian ideals in the . Why not arrange libertarian groups at universities? And no, it doesn’t have to be at top or prestigious ones such as Oxbridge, UCL, , , etc. Why not hold stalls at events such as or Reading Festival, which can disseminate libertarian beliefs to the younger generation?
And aren’t we at risk of losing potential libertarians? Across the World Wide Web, I have conversed with many British people who ask about the nature of the British libertarian movement. They state that there is no evident or apparent British libertarian organisation to look up to, or at least any body that is actively seeking to reach out to others. If one pictures a “newbie” libertarian in the , then what does s/he have in order to propel his or her interest? There is no introductory guide to libertarian principles in the at present. OK yes, s/he could go to a bookshop or library and read von Mises, Rothbard, Nozick, David Friedman, Hazlitt, Hayek, or any other principal libertarian thinker.
But surely reading books is not enough. People need some kind of social contact with others, since they could feel isolated otherwise. Few people in the after all are libertarian. But there are no libertarian groups which hold events designed to engage individuals. After scouring the Web and other places to search for such people and groups, then our hypothetical “newbie” libertarian might lose interest and even cease being a libertarian, since they would have little incentive to retain their views if they could find others like him or her. Is such a state of affairs fair on those waking up from the statist slumber?
I suppose one salient point can be stated as thus – what is the most prudent means of spreading libertarianism? Is a political party the right means? I personally do not think it is, and it seems the LA concur. I feel that libertarian party politics is futile and ineffectual since libertarian tenets are not in the mainstream. Thus, the masses would not vote for a viewpoint which was considered “fringe” or not consistent with the political culture of the country. If a political party has to educate others in order to succeed, then why is a political party even needed? Gradual education (in the form of directly speaking to people about libertarian values, publishing books, etc.) would be just as effective. Furthermore, isn’t running for office as a libertarian hypocritical? If (from a deontological standpoint) government involves coercion, coercion undermines individual sovereignty, and all human interaction should be voluntary and non-coercive, then why use coercion to further one’s own ends? If one were an atheist, would s/he appear consistent if they attempted to spread atheism by applying to be a Reverend in the Anglican Church?
Moreover, if accounting the points raised in the previous paragraph, then I do not see how appealing to the ruling class to implement liberty is prudent either. Politicians run for office because they enjoy possessing and wielding power. There is no genuine “desire” to “help” their citizens. Gordon Brown, David Milliband, Jacqui Brown, etc. all wish for power, since this is the reason people enter politics. Because politicians are only power hungry, then why should they listen to appeals to institute libertarian tenets? Governments persistently grow because politicians crave power and dominion over others. Thus, this means that politicians seek to impose their authority on all areas of society. In essence, a politician’s will for control is akin to a weed in a garden. It spreads unabated until it consumes everything. Any concept or idea of “limited government” then would be anathema to politicians.