Hey, I thought Alec Guiness was great. He always is. I just thought that with the prequels, George focused way too much on the FX to care about the acting or…well, I’ll just let Mr. Plinkett do the talking.
They should make a joseph stalin cunt destroyer movie.
I’ve seen Plinkett’s reviews, lol. He’s absolutely right about everything. I just think people tend to forget how cheesy the original films were. Funny thing about Alec Guiness, he absolutely hated Star Wars because he thought it was juvenile and silly, and he grew so frustrated that his role as Kenobi had become his most famous, that he would refuse to autograph Star Wars stuff, even for kids.
@ Kelvin Silva
What the fuck is a “cunt destroyer?” Sounds awful.
@ TronCat
Wow, I had no idea. And yes, the classics are indeed cheesy, at least for this day and age. But personally, I think they have a deep meaning to them. I can remember the first time I saw it as a little kid and it blew my mind.
Oh geez. I just looked up stuff that Alec Guiness did. Pretty harsh, I had no idea he hated the films so much.
Skeptical- Stalin’s red army: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany
Hence the term: cunt destroyer.
Also heres another definition if u ought: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Cunt%20Destroyer
Wow. I had heard of the rape of German women before, but I didn’t know it was that massive. Terrible.
@ SM- That’s not a very charitable interpretation of There Will Be Blood. I liked it a lot and thought there was much more depth to DDL’s character than many people thought. Sure people will latch on and try to propagandize it, but it should be obvious even to them that they’re no longer talking about the move. Even PTA said it wasn’t a political film.
Yeah, PTA did an interview with Henry Rollins where Rollins just kept asking if it was about “Bush and oil” (I’m paraphrasing), and Paul seemed very uncomfortable. I did not see any anti-capitalist or even anti-religious message in the film at all. It was very clear that these characters were extreme personalities who did not “stand in for” whole swaths of society (like so many lazy critics would like to believe of every movie), but were meant to be just themselves, individuals. That is where the interest and the drama came in.
But then I really love PTA and his movies, so maybe I have rose colored glasses when it comes to his intentions.
Yeah, PTA did an interview with Henry Rollins where Rollins just kept asking if it was about “Bush and oil” (I’m paraphrasing), and Paul seemed very uncomfortable. I did not see any anti-capitalist or even anti-religious message in the film at all. It was very clear that these characters were extreme personalities who did not “stand in for” whole swaths of society (like so many lazy critics would like to believe of every movie), but were meant to be just themselves, individuals. That is where the interest and the drama came in.
But then I really love PTA and his movies, so maybe I have rose colored glasses when it comes to his intentions.
Haha yeah I remember Rollins saying like “So yeah this is about multinational oil corporations raping the world right?!!” And PTA was like “Naaa, man… naaaaa…”
Well keep in mind that I haven’t seen the film since 2007, and my way of interperating a film was much, much, much different back then.
I would go see it for DDL and Spielberg.
Spielberg movies always have a high production but I have recently arrived at the conclusion that his movies are a bit showy or over the top, melodramatic. But I will definitely watch this movie as it looks like it has a high production level and a good casts.
Back to the Lincoln movie: I saw the trailer, and its objective seems to be to paint Lincoln as history’s great warrior against slavery. The film will be a tragic exercise in mythological hero worship, methinks. Now it will be even more difficult for the average joe to understand actual history, thanks to the Hollywood genius himself. And btw, Spielberg, thanks for that last Indiana Jones film…
This would be a great movie for someone like Tom Woods to review and point out the “Hollywood vs. History” aspect of it!
Thanks for E.T., Jurassic Park, Jaws, Raiders of the Last Ark, Temple of Doom, Last Crusade, The Lost World, Saving Private Ryan, and Minority Reprt.
I liked The Color Purple and Schindler’s List too.
I wonder if John Williams will do the music?
(EDIT: I just checked imdb.com and yes, Williams is doing the music.)
Saying There WIll Be Blood is anti-capitalist or anti-religion is like saying Boogie Nights is anti-porn. THey’re HUMAN STORIES, and have no political message at all.
As for the Lincoln film, I read somewhere that the man is not presented so perfectly as many have suggested it might. I have no doubt that the grand theme will be the protection of the “Union” and have Lincoln be a ‘hero’ by the end of it, but (from what I’ve read) he is depicted as being a complex individual that is a little over his head.