After having poured through the website given by troll Ace Baker ( http://nomoregames.net/ ), I have stumbled across a few very interesting things worth noting. The site seems to actually be the site of Morgan Reynolds, who happens to be an adjunct scholar of the LvMI. He has surprising ties to the 9/11 truth movement and advocates that no planes hit any of the towers. He is even listed in wikipedia for believing that space weapons destroyed the WTC towers.
Why I am requesting a look into the charge of character assassination is due to the fact that his statements in his so-called critique of Dr. Steven Jones’ work on the topic of 9/11 are laced with very cunning, yet extremely unprofessional insults. I guess this is to be expected from a guy who believes space weapons destroyed the WTC towers. Then again I don’t actually believe Morgan Reynolds believes what he says about this topic either.
Here is a nice list of articles with his and others’ names on them. Focus on how Reynolds talks about Dr. Jones in each of his articles.
Responses to some of these articles can be found here:
It makes one wonder what Reynold’s interets truly are. After all, he did spend 16 months in the Bush Adminstration:
No matter what you believe on the topic of 9/11, I don’t think that anyone should have to tolerate such behavior. You can level the charge of conspiracy theorist against me, but I’m just asking that you keep your eyes peeled and focus on this guy. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if he was a mole of some sort.
I took Dr Reynolds Law & Economics class during his last semester at A&M. I was new to libertarianism and very impressed by him at the time. I got to know him a little better because he was a thesis advisor for a close friend, and he seemed like a sane, reasonable person. Midway through the semester, his wife died, which struck him very hard. He was a cynical person before, but he seemed to have fallen into a deep depression and then, apparently, paranoia.
I have never heard him say this, I have heard him talk about how an aluminium plane would not vanish into a steel and concrete building. But i have never heard him talk about such silly things as space weapons, sounds like something people would say to discredit him. Oh it is on wikipedia then it must be true…
All this focus on personalities makes me sick, thousands of people died and you want to make a post about the individuals who have come out and shared their opinions on 911. Instead of pasting a ton of urls and expecting us to now hunt through all these articles in search of “morgan reynolds talking about jones” why not point out exactly what you are talking about by pastnig the quotes here. I would like to see exactly what reynolds has said about jones that makes you think he is attacking him.
The anti-no plane movement within the 911 movement is counter intelligence. Very simple to see that there was no planes at the pentagon and shankesville, a 10 year old could point that out and I even thought that on the day. But when it comes to the wtc then people struggle. Even though there are countless examples of proven tv fakery, people still struggle. Even though the aluminium plane vanishes into the building like it was not even hitting it, people still struggle.
Seriously i do not care about reynolds and i do not care about jones. Stop focuses on the people and do your own research.
first, saying that reynolds’ believes in space weapons is a mischaracterization of his position. i’ve read all the material on 9/11 on his site, and his position is merely that existing demolition methods do not explain for the physical disappearance of the two towers. now, as directed energy weapons have been used in iraq, and even before in the panama invasion (rumsfeld and myers admit to their development), it’s not impossible that the aerolization of glass, steel and concrete may have been the result of some sort of directed energy technology on a massive scale.
i’d recommend anyone watch the new hiroshima and see whether the questions raised are worthy of consideration.