Must See Movies

Arts and Movies
By Mr. First Nighter
Sometimes a Great Nation. dir. by Paul Newman with Newman and
Henry Fonda.

A great libertarian and individualist movie, this film predictably
bombed out with the left-liberal youth that make up the bulk of the New
York movie audience. The picture puzzled them profoundly; it was
starkly individualist, fine; but how come that the great enemy of
individualism turned out to be unions and their goon squads in the
surrounding “community”? And that the heroism of Fonda and his family
consisted in the heinous activity of strikebreaking in order to fulfill their
business contracts in lumbering? The reviewers set the picture down as
glorifying nineteenth-century individualism and its virtues, and that it
does. This is a rugged, heroic, explicitly individualist picture; it is one of
the great ones, and if the Left and the Women’s Libbers don’t like it, the
appropriate reply is the great gesture of defiance with which Paul
Newman, bloody but unbowed, ends this epic.

Good spot.

Yeah, a good addition to a top Kids / Cartoon List for sure.

Possibly make a top satire category? I’ve got the series on dvd, very good.

Just downloaded the entire oldschool series, up to ep. 2 - awesome so far.

Nope. Do I want to be? Nope.

Libertarian Movies You’ve Never Seen -http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/clark-t1.1.1.html

Captain Blood (1935)

Captain Blood stars Errol Flynn at his swashbuckling best. Flynn deservedly shot to stardom as Peter Blood, a 17th-century physician turned pirate after escaping unjust imprisonment for devoting his medical skills to rebels against the English tyrant King James.

Spirited action sequences, highly intellectual dialogue and skilled direction combine to make this film a delight.

Unlike the recent pirate films starring Marxist-Che Guevara sympathizer Johnny Depp, the art and charm of this movie lies in its well-selected background music and acting, not in special effects and buffoonery.

Radiant Olivia de Havilland is Flynn’s ideally cast co-star and romantic interest.

Watch for Flynn’s stirring and eloquent speeches to inspire his pirate crew. Flynn’s superb diction and command of the English language alone are worth the price of admission.


Filled with action, drama, passion, romance, and a story of heroic (and successful!) rebellion against tyranny, Captain Blood is a tale lovers of liberty will enjoy and treasure.

Talk of the Town (1942)

If you have not yet seen this film, you are in for a real treat…and then some. It is as witty, charming, and engaging as any libertarian – and any American – could hope for.

The moral background portrayed contrasts strongly with the profanity, violence and explicit sexual innuendo that have become standard in many of today’s films.

Cary Grant stars as Leopold Dilg, an outspoken civil libertarian, wrongly imprisoned for arson and murder. To avoid almost certain execution, Leopold breaks out of jail to gather evidence to prove his innocence.

The bad guys of the movie are a corrupt judge and mayor of a small New England town, who make Leopold the fall guy for their insurance scam.

During his escape, Leopold encounters legal scholar Michael Lightcap, played admirably and incomparably by Ronald Coleman in one of his finest roles. Their friendly intellectual exchanges on the nature of the law make the film especially worthy of attention. For example, Leopold says, “What is the law…it’s a gun pointed in someone’s face.” Lines like that are seldom heard in current-day movies.




The professor and the escapee team up with lovely and feisty local schoolteacher Nora Shelley (Jean Arthur) to find justice.

The academic theoretician becomes a man of action. In a dramatic and suspenseful courtroom scene, he demonstrates why the right to keep and bear arms is vitally important to the cause of justice. The corrupt politicians are indicted.

In the end, Nora gets her man, but which one? You will need to watch the film to the very end to discover the answer to that most intriguing question.

Unconquered (1947)

Legendary film magnate Cecil B. DeMille captures on the silver screen an important period in American history in this stirring tale of pre-Revolutionary settlers on the frontier.

Gary Cooper stars as peace-loving Chris Holden, a colonial militia Captain who buys and then frees beautiful indentured slave Abby Hale on their voyage to Virginia. Abby had been convicted in England for killing one of the King’s men while successfully defending her honor from attempted outrage.

The action shifts to western Pennsylvania. Slave trader Garth, having failed to have a law passed in England to prohibit settlement west of the Allegheny mountains, ignites a battle between Indian tribes and a small outpost of brave settlers. The film is filled with libertarian nuggets. For example, when Abby (stunning natural redhead Paulette Goddard) is re-taken into slavery, she wistfully remarks, “You don’t know what freedom’s worth until you lose it.”




A first-rate historical drama, this film features Howard Da Silva as the treacherous villain Garth and Boris Karloff as the Indian chief Guyasuta. Richard Henry Lee of Virginia and Colonel George Washington are also included as the action unfolds.

Gary Cooper saves the fort, rescues the girl, and defeats the villain in the suspenseful final scene.

Watch for the Ben Franklin quote at the conclusion: Where liberty dwells there is my country.

Tailor of Panama (2001)

No review of libertarian movies would be complete without at least one that takes a skeptical view of misguided American foreign policy. The Tailor of Panama obliges.

Harry Pendel (Geoffrey Rush) is the eponymous tailor of Panama. Born an Englishman, he is a former convict turned tailor to the rich and infamous in Panama. Harry is happily married to Louisa (Jamie Lee Curtis), who happens to be the assistant to the Canal director.

Harry plies his trade as tailor with considerable success, notwithstanding the occasional harmless fabrication – for example, a 40-inch waist is recorded as a “36 plus,” the plus being lunch.

Pierce Brosnan’s Andy Oxnard is a dapper British spy, whose only character resemblance to James Bond is his penchant for the ladies. Having been discredited for his numerous indiscretions in Europe, he is exiled to Panama where it is thought by his superiors, that he can do little harm.




Here is where their paths cross, or more accurately, double cross. Andy intimidates Harry to eavesdrop on the Canal director for whom he serves as tailor. Harry’s tales and whispers of an impending Chinese take over of the canal are gladly accepted.

Harry is a better tailor than investor. A thieving foreman and a crooked banker conspire to push his real estate investment into failure. Tempted by generous cash gifts from Andy, courtesy of British taxpayers, Harry spins fiction upon fiction. Andy soaks it up, passes it on to London, and keeps the money flowing.

When lack of substance or documentation threatens to end this lucrative scheme, Harry foolishly thinks he can bluff his way out of the deal.

Using this inaccurate and unconfirmed data, the Brits persuade the American military to send in the helicopters. The film clearly portrays the war-hungry Pentagon commanders as a group of inept, almost childish and certainly ludicrous, contemptible men.

Thankfully the combat mission they order is discontinued, but not before a bombardment of innocent civilians and peaceful Panamanian neighborhoods.

If you are looking for an entertaining venue to expose the incredible folly of a foreign policy of intervention by force of arms, this is the film for you.

The most obvious…

Wall-E? Is that a joke? That was a an eco-propaganda, anti-capitalist movie,

WALL-E: Economic Ignorance and the War on Modernity

I’ve seen about 90% of those movies and many are stretching being on there, others are incredibly bad (The Thin Red Line), or boring (Tailor of Panama).I don’t get all the mob movies as they have nothing to do with the “message”. Does the movement stand for thug brutality and the exploitation of others?

Movies off your list I would actually recommend to people in relation to individualism (you have others I just did not enjoy them),

300 (2007)

Braveheart (1995)

Cinderella Man (2005)

Demolition Man (1993)

Defiance (2008) (Irony though is that it explicitly endorses socialist order in the rebel camp)

Enemy of the State (1998)

Equilibrium (2002)

First Blood (1982)

Joyeux Noel (2005)

Lord of the Rings (2001)

Shawshank Redemption (1994)

Star Wars (1977)

The Patriot (2000)

The Matrix (1999) (I would only recommend the first one, second one was ok, the third was bad)

Tucker: A Man and His Dream (1988)

Nice work. I appreciate it.

  1. Wouldnt go amiss to add [Silmido](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silmido_(film)) and [Only Fools And Horses](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081912/). Silmido is a decent movie from a Libertarian viewpoint. Not Top10 but a Top300 certainly. It is about the state not keeping its own end of the bargain, because it doesnt need to. While the magnificent Fools and Horses needs no introduction.

  2. Maybe have Independence Day link to this review/recap. Certainly beats the imdb summary.

  3. I think such a huge list is not that helpful. Too much data can be not very informative. Just how valuable is (an unranked) list of best libertarian movies that includes Hot Fuzz? I think a smaller and more considered list would be more valuable. For example a few lists like 25 Best Libertarian Movies, 10 Best Antiwar Movies, 5 Best Dystopian Movies, 5 Best Libertarian Westerns. They would be shorter but there would actually be more information in them.

Thanks for the link. And thanks for calling it out, as should be done. Others have interpreted it as individualistic, although I’m not sure if that is being generous or not. The movies are open to interpretation, though the point of this is to weed out the ones that are not so obvious / clear to the general public - as being in favor of what we support.

So I encourage discussion. By the way, still haven’t removed the ones brought up earlier, or added any to the list as of yet.

No worries. Not yet done. [:)]

Thanks for the movie rating, it helps put it in a ball park.

Good point. Will do.

Yes I agree completely, this is the base level really - it will hopefully only get smaller. Maybe suggestions for categories? Those ones you mentioned are great so far. Might be an idea just to couple them, and not rate them in an order or 1 → 25. Anyway:

Best Antiwar Movies

Best Dystopian Movies

Best Libertarian Westerns

Best Anti-State / Anti-Status Quo

Best Satire / Comedy

Best Conspiracy / Corruption

Best Individualist / Anti Conformist / Anti Collectivist

Best Business / Entrepreneur

Best Gangster

I would strongly recommend Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, which portrays a corrupt government with a media propaganda machine under it’s control preferring to save public relational face than perform it’s duty of providing security to it’s citizens, and which sends a classic nanny state bureaucrat of a villain to attempt to manage a private school, and ends up greatly worsening the quality of education while more and more meddlesome regulations keep piling up. Only the private Order of the Phoenix is capable of combating criminals in that day and age, and they do so in the face of government condemnation.

Yes I will try to think a little bit about it, see if I can offer any insight. But right now what buggs me a bit is what sort of a valuation are we looking for. I mean a movie can be very libertarian in its message and insight while being merely average as a work of cinema. On the other hand a movie can be fantastic as a work of cinema, but be libertarian only in part while the other part of its motiffs is taken by some neutral stuff. So which of the two is more worthy of being on a list of Best Libertarian Movies? The better movie or the more libertarian one?

This is a good idea guys.

I’ve created a page that everyone can use to put the list and continually improve it:

http://www.vforvoluntary.com/wiki/RecommendedMovies

I’ve set the privileges right now so that anyone can edit this page without having to register (I may change that after a while). Just double-click on the page and you can edit.

There is protection against double edits (two people at the same time), so don’t need to worry about that; although it’s still recommended to keep offline copies.

There are still advantages to registering (to see who edited what, coordination), but it’s up to you.

Captain Blood is such a great movie.

Don’t forget Harry Potter also has a commodity-based money system backed with 100% reserve banking and seemingly no government interference [:P]

That made me chuckle when I read about that. I’m still trying to deduce whether Gringotts is a central bank.

Well, it seemed as if Gringotts was run independently by a minority of “good-with-money” goblins (which seems like a snipe at Jews, if you ask me).

Although we never hear of other banks it’s possible that they can exist. Perhaps Gringotts performs to the market so well that it’s a natural monopoly of sorts, if not simply the largest banking provider.

I don’t think there would be a problem with people (or creatures) lending money or opening their own banks…

Natural monopolies? Bah! I refuse to accept such fairy tales in a story of witch and wizards!

Bleh, leave it to the good-with-money goblins, I say. Perhaps they have an untarnished record of trust spanning thousands of years! [:P]

Oh sure, lest we forget the Gringott’s gold seizures of 1933!

This is because Harry Potter doesn’t have a band of androgynous, benevolent elves romping around the countryside protecting everyone from evil [:P]

Obviously Saron wouldn’t of become a thread if there was a strong head of state in the white city. Bolster the executive! Allow for preemptive strikes!

The elves were benevolent enough to be non-interventionists. The less of a threat they appeared to Sauron the more he’d simply ignore them [:P]