No, and no. I’m a bit more optimistic than some of the other posters in this thread. Personally, I think there are a lot of freedom-loving people spread about the world. Because different states with differing levels of freedom exist, someone can still find a place “good enough,” or can travel about to avoid the rule of any one state. If these options were no longer viable, I think there’d be a lot more protest, which would hopefully lead to a decentralization of power.
(Sorry if this made no sense. I’m kind of in a mental funk right now.)
Well… you have Europe in the EU with more centralization every day and a universal currency… You have everyone in the UN talking about the African Union and an African currency… And you have the great pan american highway they’ve been trying to build for sometime as well as Geithner saying that they are seriously considering a pan american currency…
It certainly looks like things are getting more and more centralized… imo who cares if there’s 1 world government. Wouldn’t it be just as bad if there were only 2 or 3 world governments that did exactly the same thing? This is what we’re headed towards now. World government maybe sometime in the future. They won’t need to though if the world currencies are all controlled by the same group. They can just inflate and take whatever they want…
And my favorite NWO conspiracy: Look on the back of a Federal Reserve Note… “Novus Ordo Seclorum”. It doesn’t quite mean “New World Order”, but almost!