Well it’s not “bad” per se, but I will propose that it can get annoying, especially when the “devil’s advocate arguments” are basic fallacies that actually have been “debunked so many times and in so many ways it’s not even funny.” That’s a large part of the entire purpose of the “argumentation” section of the Ultimate Beginner meta-thread (especially the “___ threads” threads).
I mean, the question here is easily a matter of economic fact (as close as you can get to it anyway), and if you’d read those sources you’d easily have plenty of ways to answer. It’s not like a more abstract philosophical question, or a request for best practices when dealing with a specific kind of person or something like that.
What you’re asking for here is something that actually has been done to death.
But if you ever want resources, ask away. That’s the best. (Obviously it would be good to check the meta thread and the links there to see if resources are already compiled), but ultimately simply requesting info on where to go to further your own study is kind of what is wanted. If you need clarification on something you’ve read, that’s great too. There’s plenty of threads with those kinds of questions and they get resolved pretty quickly.
But I actually created a special forum just for “devil’s advocate”, so if you’re ever inclined, have at it there.