You remember incorrectly. What I didn’t have time for was to look into Argumentation Ethics to write the refutation in the first place without some thing provided for me to respond to.
Remember this?
Again, if you want something from me, give me something concrete to respond to that you think undermines my position, even if it’s only a single paragraph, and I’ll respond.
But I don’t write monographs on cue.
After insisting on a response without providing me something to respond to you finally quoted Hoppe. I responded with a fully Misesian point that Hoppe’s entire enterprise of trying to “refute” a value judgment is non-sensical to begin with. Instead of grappling with my point, you just wrote “hurt-piece” and told me to go write a Mises Daily, to which I replied:
Are you saying my argument is somehow “drunken” or “ugly”? If so, how so?
ERO,
You repeatedly ask me to respond to Hoppe’s ArgEthics. You finally give me something to chew on, so I do so with a fully Misesian analysis of Hoppe’s vain attempt to refute a value judgment, and all you have in response is childish teh-internetz-speak? And you have the nerve to say you’re embarrassed by me?