Well that’s cool. Unfortunately to admit that my friends are of low quality would also mean that I am of low quality because I associate with them. I am adverse to making such a statement. You understand, I’m sure, MagicGraham.
Warmonger… fear is the tyrants tool. It’s easy to see why liberty has been violated with blockheads like Jacob having to use brute force just to clean up bear cans. Imagine Jacob in government. Pissed because somebody left a notepad on the sofa and I wouldn’t doubt Jacob would try to nuke him.
Hasn’t failed yet, my friend. I could make the argument that it’s runaway socialism that is tearing apart my favorite system. So even if it does fail, it will be argued that we never had a properly limited government.
i wasn’t questioning your friends characters and qualities so much as your very relationship with them. sorry to give the wrong impression. I have friends that express all sorts of different qualities, they have strengths and failings, but we are at least ‘good to each other’. I hope you aren’t missing out.
I would like to think my stern approach to getting them to do what I wanted them to do was not in fact bad for the overall relationship, but instead instilled respect in them. I don’t know if this is true, but it’s what I like to think. Besides, can’t a little threat now and then be part of being “good to each other?” I think so.
It has failed. And I take it you grant the other three points ? Limited government was supposed to protect property - in reality it destroys it - I call that failure.
By the way, your fanatical support for the army means you support the army of a socialist country, go figure.
Lol, that’s exactly the argument I make about the housing bubble though. I say it’s the Fed’s fault. Had the Fed not been around we wouldn’t have gotten excessive credit and thus a credit contraction because the market would’ve pulled the “punchbowl” away a long time before Greenspan or Bernanke did.
perhaps yours was justified…, you were the property owner and you have standards? did you make them known in advance?, were they coercing you and you defending? if you want to justify yourself please do…
of course, if you feel like being a bully towards innocents and ‘friends’, thats what you will do (even if you shouldn’t)
I don’t accept the other three points as being totally applicable to the US. The military is necessary. I do not accept any other position. Although, I understand other people will have them.
My chief concern is with finding a workable political philosophy. This site doesn’t have one. It’s so enmeshed in philosophy that it’s become disjointed from actual politics. I hope this changes eventually.
Also, the other thing you have to think about is that a little confiscation of property goes to protect the larger part. Without a large public military, the society will ultimately be taken over. That means a total loss of property and freedom.
That’s impossible in your case. You’re unable to understand basic logical objections to your ‘theory’.
You don’t understand why minimal government is nonsense.
The commies and the welfare state are oh so evil. But the deranged right wingers and their warfare state are just fine.
You don’t understand that in order to have your parasitic warfare state other politicians and parasites must have their welfare state. It’s all about cooperation.