What’s the difference between “necessary” and “unnecessary” danger?
There’s really no way to know. This is pure speculation.
Why because I don’t go into hysterics over something like this? I don’t jump to conclusions. I’m looking at the information that was presented, nothing more. Do you have any evidence that a heart surgery patient was held up or that a lawyer lost 1,000 dollars in billable hours? No. You have literally no evidence. You’re speculating. You say this imaginary lawyer would be laughed out of court. Really? When did that happen? Show me the case file. Yet I’m the one shooting from the hip? Please.
No. I ignored the napalm thing because it’s silly hyperbole used to make a rhetorical connection between something which would probably be seen as a complete overreaction to most people with something that was arguably overdone. You clearly think the police overused their police powers in this instance, I get it. I don’t feel the same way.