I seriously do not understand why you would prefer that rule of law to our current rule of law.
I do not think that actually reflects the reality of the social order but instead what you would want the social order to be. Obviously human nature is not what you wish it were.
I would tell any of those people that the reason they were detained was because they were caught in an extraordinary circumstance where the police could not fully observe their due process rights at that time and the circumstance seemed to warrant an irregular form of detention. If they refused to accept that then they could file suit against the police station. I’d be interested to see how the case played out, I do think they might have a strong due process claim.
They did.
I don’t know what you mean.
The market process would undoubtedly be more efficient in certain ways, but that kind of efficiency is not something I’m interested in when it comes to dispensing the law.
How much money did you pay in state income taxes last year?
Yes and no. Abuse is more of an annoyance to me than inefficiency but then determining what constitutes abuse and inefficiency can be difficult. Obviously this might be an example of abuse but I’m not seeking an alternative way after seeing this though I might like to know if the cops violated those people’s constitutional rights.
No it’s because I don’t trust you to have any idea what the law ought to be for you or anyone else. And I hope you’re never allowed to do the sort of damage I imagine you’d do if you could make those choices for yourself.
Also did you read the opinions for these cases you recommended?