For anyone who has read Max Stirner:
Could the Union of Egoists he be describing be nothing more than a way to talk about the division of labor?
For anyone who has read Max Stirner:
Could the Union of Egoists he be describing be nothing more than a way to talk about the division of labor?
It sounds pretty close. Of course a voluntary division of labor may be a necessary but not sufficient condition of being “egoistic” enough to the tune of Stirner’s liking.