I see several holes in that.
“growth was the slowest of any Latin American country”
You mean it grew naturally, instead of with artificial bubbles?
“Worse, income inequality grew severe”
‘Income inequality’ is nonsense.
“..Chile also became one of the most polluted countries in Latin America”
So what? Could that be because much of Latin America isnt heavily industrialized?
None of this should be surprising, though. By and large, Wikipedia’s main political editors are either social democrats or flat out marxists.