The Gentleman's Guide To Forum Spies

COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a ‘uncontrolled forum.’

Technique #1 - ‘FORUM SLIDING’

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by ‘forum sliding.’ In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to ‘age.’ Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a ‘forum slide.’ The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a ‘forum slide’ and ‘flush’ the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then ‘replying’ to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting ‘slides’ down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - ‘CONSENSUS CRACKING’

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com) is ‘consensus cracking.’ To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger ‘evidence’ or disinformation in your favour is slowly ‘seeded in.’ Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then ‘abort’ the consensus cracking by initiating a ‘forum slide.’

Technique #3 - ‘TOPIC DILUTION’

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a ‘RESOURCE BURN.’ By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a ‘gossip mode.’ In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to ‘drive in the wedge.’ By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - ‘INFORMATION COLLECTION’

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a ‘show you mine so me yours’ posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your ‘favourite weapon’ and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite ‘technique of operation.’ From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - ‘ANGER TROLLING’

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to ‘stage’ a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to ‘lead’ the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you ‘do not care what the authorities think!!’ inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - ‘GAINING FULL CONTROL’

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the ‘ultimate victory’ as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a ‘honey pot’ gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

http://pastebin.com/irj4Fyd5

Question: Was the above information ultimately copy and pasted from some publication by COINTELPRO?

Nice. There is no doubt that the Pentagon and probably other Federal agencies are operating active “information warfare” units that have a presence on Internet forums. How could the government not troll, it’s like the biggest IRL troll ever!

Clayton -

My tax dollars pay people to play on forums all day long:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

"The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries”.

Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said: “The technology supports classified blogging activities on foreign-language websites to enable Centcom to counter violent extremist and enemy propaganda outside the US.”

He said none of the interventions would be in English, as it would be unlawful to “address US audiences” with such technology, and any English-language use of social media by Centcom was always clearly attributed. The languages in which the interventions are conducted include Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto.

Centcom said it was not targeting any US-based web sites, in English or any other language, and specifically said it was not targeting Facebook or Twitter."

Right, because the government has never done that before: http://levees.org/personal-attacks-and-lies-posted-to-internet-by-army-corps-of-engineers-about-new-orleans-citizens/

As I was reading the OP, I was laughing as I was imagining these trolling agents as thinking highly of themselves for being so great at what they do. Like, they probably wear headsets with mics as they go on trolling raids.

Hey, it’s all about effectiveness on the margin. Ever since 911, the gov has been all over muslim forums, doing serious intel work and lead development, angling themselves into mod positions and much more.

I don’t think anyone on the Mises forums is ever likely to become a combatant, much as we may think the us gov illegitimate, due to our commitment generally to the NAP, so, like, w/e man.

@ Clayton

Lol,

Is the Real face of

uh oh!

I’ve lurked on these forums for quite some time, and I always get suspicious when someone joins the forums and then immediatly starts asking about “militant” actions or something of that nature. Who thinks like that? Oh, hey, I like the what ideology x is saying. So…when do we blow stuff up?

It’s just creepy.

This made me laugh so much, I couldn’t resist photoshopping it!

Dumbass government trolls.

Clayton -

When Clayton finally exposed himself, the truth finally become clear.

The sliding/spamming thing happens on alt news sites all the time. Anytime something new happens in, say gunwalker, for instance, youll get a dozen articles on the poles shifting, they found bigfoots body, fema concentration camps with s&m dungeons, the works.

hey does anybody know about the social media monitoring software that is supposed to track aggregated emotions? Like supposedly they predicted the revolution in egypt by a spike in the percentage of negative adjectives or whatever:

@Malachi: I think these analysis ideas are poppycock. They ignore two key things - 1) the most valuable facts - in terms of predicting the future - are locked inside the mind of the decision-maker alone until the moment he or she makes the decision and 2) most information is copy/paste, that is, the Internet is a giant echo-chamber. Also, the Egyptian “revolution” was not. The regime was toppled by foreign intelligence, I think mostly Mossad but likely CIA, MI6 and even French foreign intelligence were involved.

Clayton -

Agree on all your points. What if you confined your analysis to social media, filtered for original comments (and not articles or quotes) and tried to aggregate sentiment? Would you be able to track an emotional recession? I mean, if youre in a crowd and people get angry, you dont have to have the valuable facts inside their heads in order to figure out that they’re angry, the volume and tone of voice could be sufficient. Well replace tone of voice with certain words, and replace volume with frequency. Useless or no?

The funny thing about the Egyptian uprising is apparently many people “on the street” knew of it well in advance. I used to work with a fellow who owned a factory in Egypt, and he told me that several days before it began the doorman at his hotel there told him it was good he was departing for the US that day because “big things” were about to happen. My acquaintance asked him “what things”? And the man just smiled and said “big things - good things” and wished him a safe trip.

The Keystone Kops in our intelligence agencies were of course “totally surprised.”

I think this is appropriate:

[view: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2a4Xkq6wu0]

Anyways…

Hey guys, what is austrian economics? Do you have a meeting? At what time? Who goes? What is monetary policy? What are the goals of the austrians?

Is it possible to (and I know you don’t like this) prove that? It makes little sense to me that the US would spend 70 billion dollars keeping Mubarak in power and then one day “roll the dice” with al-quaeda.

It seems equally unlikely that Libya was anything more than a roll of the dice, not a coordinateed plan.

Like, when you say “mostly Mossad,” what “evidence” do you have to run on? It seems to me the only connection betwen the US that can be made is through the National Endowment for Democracy…which is not a paramilitary CIA operation, but a State Dept. foreign propaganda network.