I don’t know what “it” is, but Wikipedia has lost it. An in depth synopsis of “Baby Got Back”:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Got_Back
This has to be a joke, but than again Wikipedia is a joke.
I for one am impressed. On the one side I learned something about culture I didn’t expect, on the other side, it shows the dedication of some people to topics of little to absolutely no consequence. Hundreds of edits, man. Respect.
I thought this was funny…
Apparently he didn’t know that there is no such thing as targeted weight loss.
Wikipedia can surprise me sometimes. I remember years back they kept removing the Tourettes Guy page, even though he was pretty famous as an internet persona, but they have a page of racial slurs, which somehow passes as “ok”.
I don’t find this page as unorthodox though, since it was a pretty well known song.
Well, isn’t the abundance of information a good thing? And values aren’t subjective?
You sound like a marxist talking.
I think, regardless of whether you are a religious fundamentalist or an atheist fanatic there’s something deeply, deeply, deeply wrong with an encyclopedia where an article on a creature from a children’s cartoon is longer than the article on God.
Maybe the creature can spit fire and electricute things.
I don’t find this page as unorthodox though, since it was a pretty well known song.
ex the 1st sentence: "In the opening verse, Sir Mix-A-Lot professes his affinity for large buttocks and his inability to disguise this fact from others."
Liplosuction is targeted weight (fat) loss.
Ha, it seems like it should be on EncyclopediaDramatica.
Nah, there’s not enough references to the promiscuity of the readers mother and the spelling is too good. Might fit on Uncyclopedia, though, assuming you added 50 references to Oscar Wilde and Doctor Who.
I guess you are trying to be a smart ass. I obviously meant metabolically.
I wouldnt’ve believed it… till I clicked. I guess there’s pretentious fucks everywhere these days.
Remember, this is all a series of tubes.
Also, since we are on the discussion of trivial topics, Craigslist keeps removing my post. Hopefully this will last longer than 7 hours.
Uh, either that, or they were just kidding.
Apparently not too many knitting or pumkin-chunkin aficionados here. A lot of believers in the subjectivity of values, though.
Uh, either that, or they were just kidding.
I really hope they weren’t kidding, id doubt it, but it’s fun to dream. Still though, it’s odd that the article has been allowed to maintain that style. It may be only a matter of time before “dude humour” and fanfic articles takes over wikipedia.
I shudder to think of a fanfiction wikipedia. “Today’s Featured Article: The Forbidden Love Affair of Megatron and Sailor Moon. But Will Darth Vader Object To This Betrayal?”
A “dude humour” wiki would probably be hilarious, though. The only trouble would be deciding whether ridiculously over the top masculinity, frat boys, surfers or stoners would make a funnier basis for the whole thing.