Watch out for those Rich People!

Who knows what they’ll get up to?

This aspect of philanthropy is rarely mentioned in the public feting of wealthy benefactors. On the contrary, the role of philanthropy in funding universities — as well as hospitals, museums, art galleries, concert halls and opera houses — is typically advanced as one of the reasons we shouldn’t be concerned by the rise of billionaires. After all, we’re told, our public institutions need money, following the cutbacks of the 1990s.

Of course, the problem is circular. If governments hadn’t cut tax levels so deeply — particularly for those at the upper end — there would be sufficient revenue to sustain our public institutions, as there was in the early postwar years.

The public also has an inflated sense of how much financing wealthy donors actually provide through philanthropy. For instance, there was much celebration in April 2010 when it was announced that a new $35 million donation from Peter Munk would enable the University of Toronto to establish a school of global studies. The new Munk School of Global Affairs (incorporating the existing Munk Centre for International Studies) is to be housed in a century-old stone building on fashionable Bloor Street West, and feature an elevated pixel board flashing the latest world news headlines.

If they have enough money left to donate to charity, they’re clearly not taxed enough!

Their thesis seems to be (it’s hard to figure, their reasoning is so muddled) that billionaires are not government bureaucrats so they should not be planning the distribution of resources in society and they should not be choosing which individuals university buildings will be named after.

As you know, the naming of university buildings after billionaires is what is wrong with society. If only we lived in a world where university buildings were never named after billionaires.

Clayton -

The book is written by a “Tax Law Professor”

Gimme a break - I’ll be happy when we are rid of that entire profession.