Yes.
There is anti-semitism everywhere. There is racism, sexism everywhere too. Jews don’t have a monopoly on sorrow or oppression. I’m not going to play the anti-semitism game, been there, done that. I’m avoiding the subject, because it leads only to your irrational argument that war and destruction is justified by your perceived past racial victimhood.
Certainly. Only government is capable of organizing mass murder, rape and property destruction on a vast scale. Private criminals can never do the amount of damage government does. The funny (or rather sad) thing is that all warring factions claim that they have the moral high ground while their enemies are ‘barbarians’, and yet all sides commit the very same crimes.
What you did, was a familiar tactic, I’ve seen it dozens of times online. In the midst of a losing argument, you tried to say “I am Jewish, and not agreeing with me, or allowing my perspective, means you might be anti-semitic”
Anti-semitism has nothing to do with the topic at hand. It’s shameful you would play that card in the house of Mises and Rothbard.
I never said anything about anti-semitism in America. You did. You are trying to pass of a canard.
My point was that government enabled anti-semitism. Governments are capable of genocide.
Of course I did!! You claim the goverment is the root of all evil, but claim I’m irrational evader when I make cases for sources of evil which is not goverment!
Well, saying goverment is evil has nothing to do with the idea of wardship I presented in the begining of the tread. I didn’t seek opoinions upon legitimacy of goverments, nor of its moral values. I merely suggested non-fiscal policy for running structures. Keep bashing me for it as long as oyu pay your taxes! Thats the "rational’ thing to do.
Source?
Why would you fund something you consider immoral?
I think you’re lost. This is the Austrian school, anti-war and minarchist at least, anarchist at best. “Non-fiscal” is code for facism.
Maybe you should find another forum to complain about Islamic fundamentalism and play your victim games. You’re not going to get much play with that nonsense here.
You’re in no position to judge me. Your country is a parasite, living off of foreign aid, and then using that money to perpetuate apartheid. It’s sickening how you try to play victim when you encourage a system of violence and oppression. So much so, you want to find “better” ways to fund it.
All right. Just explain ,e how this is connected to usage of property by not owner but a ward, and I’ll apologize for mentioning the word “goverment”, alright?
Referring back to the OP, how exactly is intellectual property legitimate property? I don’t understand it. Lets take the example of music sharing. My friend has an album he would like to share with me. We make a copy, and now we both have the album. We haven’t stolen the creator’s property - he still has the original. Could somebody explain why (or if) that is wrong?
The state does provide an incentive to continue antisemitic discrimination. In a free market a business would have an incentive to not discriminate against a potential customer, but if they can get money from the state, not to mention regulatory favors that hinder competition, there is not as strong an incentive to run the most productive business model. I think we can assume that if antisemitic practices continue, not only will those people remain antisemitic, others will adopt those prejudices after observing it as acceptable behavior in others. So yes, the state does contribute to antisemitism as well as other prejudices. I don’t see what this has to do with the subject at hand though.
Alright, it took me a while.
Had the following been discussed on the forum, and if so, where?
“The anarchists overlook the undeniable fact that some people are either too narrow-minded or too weak to adjust themselves spontaneously to the conditions of social life. Even if we admit that every sane adult is endowed with the faculty of realizing the good of social cooperation and of acting
accordingly, there still remains the problem of the infants, the aged, and the insane. We may agree that he who acts antisocially should be considered mentally sick and in need of care. But as long as not all are cured, and as long as there are infants and the senile, some provision must be taken lest
they jeopardize society. An anarchistic society would be exposed to the mercy of every individual. Society cannot exist if the majority is not ready to hinder, by the application or threat of violent action, minorities from destroying the social order. This power is vested in the state or government.”
Mises, Human Action VIII Human Society
It has, and all one can say is that Mises does not understand market anarchism.